2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10101-015-0158-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the “slippery slope framework” among self-employed taxpayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
70
1
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
70
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This facilitating of voluntary compliance is then followed by persuasion through enhancing the benefits of registration, and only as a last resort for the small minority still refusing to be compliant does it use punitive measures based on increasing the costs of nonregistration (Braithwaite, 2009;Job, Stout, & Smith, 2007). A second approach is the "slippery slope framework" (Kirchler, Hoelzl, & Wahl, 2008), which pursues both voluntary and enforced compliance concurrently by developing both greater trust in authorities (e.g., by reducing formal institutional imperfections and institutional incongruence) and the greater power of authorities by improving the benefits of registration and costs of nonregistration (Kogler, Muelbacher, & Kirchler, 2015;Muehlbacher, Kirchler, & Schwarzenberger, 2011;Wahl, Kastlunger, & Kirchler, 2010). Until now however, there has been no comparative evaluation of which sequencing and/or combination of measures is the most appropriate and/or effective means of fostering registration in different contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This facilitating of voluntary compliance is then followed by persuasion through enhancing the benefits of registration, and only as a last resort for the small minority still refusing to be compliant does it use punitive measures based on increasing the costs of nonregistration (Braithwaite, 2009;Job, Stout, & Smith, 2007). A second approach is the "slippery slope framework" (Kirchler, Hoelzl, & Wahl, 2008), which pursues both voluntary and enforced compliance concurrently by developing both greater trust in authorities (e.g., by reducing formal institutional imperfections and institutional incongruence) and the greater power of authorities by improving the benefits of registration and costs of nonregistration (Kogler, Muelbacher, & Kirchler, 2015;Muehlbacher, Kirchler, & Schwarzenberger, 2011;Wahl, Kastlunger, & Kirchler, 2010). Until now however, there has been no comparative evaluation of which sequencing and/or combination of measures is the most appropriate and/or effective means of fostering registration in different contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second approach is the "slippery slope framework" which pursues both voluntary and enforced compliance concurrently by developing both greater trust in authorities and the greater power of authorities (Kogler et al, 2015;Muehlbacher et al, 2011;Wahl et al, 2010).…”
Section: Combining the Hard Direct And Soft Indirect Control Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome is that a combination of both greater trust in authorities and the greater power of authorities is seen to be a potent combination. Grounded in this finding, the suggestion is that pursuing both is the most effective means of tackling informal entrepreneurship (Kogler et al, 2015).…”
Section: Slippery Slope Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%