1985
DOI: 10.2307/2530666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Statistical Certainty of a Response to Increasing Doses of a Drug

Abstract: Experiments in which the treatments are composed of a series of doses of a compound and a zero dose control are often used in animal toxicity studies. A test procedure is proposed to assess trends in the response variable. The notion of a no-statistical-significance-of-trend (NOSTASOT) dose is introduced, and questions of multiplicity of statistical tests in this context are addressed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
217
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 475 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
217
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between patients with and without MTS were evaluated using Student's t tests, while the correlation between histological characteristics and DTI parameters were evaluated with one-tailed Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) including all TLE patients, regardless of the presence of MTS. We performed correction for multiple comparisons for the correlations between histological parameters and FA measurements (our main outcome measure) using the Tukey-Ciminera-Heyse procedure (a variant of the Bonferroni correction) (Tukey et al, 1985;Sankoh et al, 1997). Likewise, correction for multiple comparisons was performed separately for correlations between quantitative histology and MD, parallel and perpendicular diffusivities (i.e., 24 tests), and between-group differences (i.e., 8 tests).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between patients with and without MTS were evaluated using Student's t tests, while the correlation between histological characteristics and DTI parameters were evaluated with one-tailed Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) including all TLE patients, regardless of the presence of MTS. We performed correction for multiple comparisons for the correlations between histological parameters and FA measurements (our main outcome measure) using the Tukey-Ciminera-Heyse procedure (a variant of the Bonferroni correction) (Tukey et al, 1985;Sankoh et al, 1997). Likewise, correction for multiple comparisons was performed separately for correlations between quantitative histology and MD, parallel and perpendicular diffusivities (i.e., 24 tests), and between-group differences (i.e., 8 tests).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the lowest effective dose, a step-down dose-finding procedure based on linear contrast was employed. 25,26 For BMI, leptin, Beck Depression Inventory, carbohydrate craving, QoL, and waist-to-hip circumference, we used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline measurement as a covariate and treatment group and center as factors and a baseline measurement by treatment group interaction term included in the model. For these variables, missing data were not imputed.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of three separate experiments. For each experiment, the data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance followed by the means multiple comparison method of Tukey (24). p Ͻ 0.05 was considered as the level of statistical significance.…”
Section: P-labeled P47mentioning
confidence: 99%