“…Considering that (a) interactivity refers to “the extent to which source and receiver are interchangeable roles” and “the ability to influence the presentation of content” (Walther, Gay, & Hancock, , p. 640) and (b) interactivity positively predicts presence (Lombard & Ditton, ; Steuer, ), such awareness of the interaction potential may foster the illusory perception of face‐to‐face conversation with the candidate. In fact, studies have confirmed the hypothesized link between interactivity and presence, such that perceived feedback was positively associated with psychological propinquity (Korzenny & Bauer, ) and users felt stronger social presence of the computer agent when allowed to determine the order of message presentation (Skalski & Tamborini, ). In a similar vein, if more structured communication with a larger number of rules for interactants to follow lowers perceived propinquity (Korzenny, ), a TV talk show featuring a carefully orchestrated and potentially scripted interaction between the candidate and the hosts, created in compliance with various rules and regulations governing its production, might suppress social presence.…”