2018
DOI: 10.1177/0894439318810715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Use of Voice Input in a Smartphone Web Survey

Abstract: We implemented an experiment within a smartphone web survey to explore the feasibility of using voice input (VI) options. Based on device used, participants were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. Respondents in the iPhone operating system (iOS) treatment group were asked to use the dictation button, in which the voice was translated automatically into text by the device. Respondents with Android devices were asked to use a VI button which recorded the voice and transmitted the audio file. Both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from previous literature suggest that using VI in web surveys could lead to improvements but also that a number of challenges remain. In particular, what seems to be the most problematic but also the most promising option (Revilla, Couper, Bosch, & Asensio, 2018) is voice recording (Android): Indeed, it leads to very high nonresponse and significantly lower survey evaluation, but also to longer and more elaborated answers. Therefore, in this article, we focus on voice recording in a smartphone survey (Android only) and focus on improving the implementation of this tool, building on the experiment of .…”
Section: Goals and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from previous literature suggest that using VI in web surveys could lead to improvements but also that a number of challenges remain. In particular, what seems to be the most problematic but also the most promising option (Revilla, Couper, Bosch, & Asensio, 2018) is voice recording (Android): Indeed, it leads to very high nonresponse and significantly lower survey evaluation, but also to longer and more elaborated answers. Therefore, in this article, we focus on voice recording in a smartphone survey (Android only) and focus on improving the implementation of this tool, building on the experiment of .…”
Section: Goals and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supplemental material for this article is available online. Revilla et al 2020). This line of research will certainly be extended to cognitive probes in the future, too.…”
Section: Declaration Of Conflicting Interestsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Smartphones offer many opportunities for innovative data collection that can be used for studying social science research questions as well as for methodological research. Examples include collecting expenditure data with receipt scanning apps (Ja ¨ckle et al, 2019), offering voice input options for answering open-ended questions (Revilla et al, 2020;Revilla & Couper, 2019), and asking respondents to take photographs for supplementing survey responses (Bosch et al, 2019a). Particularly, smartphone sensors, such as accelerometer, gyroscope, and GPS, allow the collection of detailed information that can be used to enrich and augment web survey data from smartphones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a person moves or walks, they are creating acceleration (He et al, 2016), which is detected by the smartphone that is commonly worn on the body (e.g., in the pocket). This situation can be applied to respondents that have the smartphone in their hands and complete a web survey, referring to a "respondent-device" link (Ho ¨hne, Revilla, et al, 2020;Ho ¨hne & Schlosser, 2019). To put it differently, respondents' motions are detectable by the acceleration sensor of smartphones, allowing researchers to classify smartphone respondents on the basis of their motion levels (i.e., acceleration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%