2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13178-016-0263-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Validity and Factor Structure of the Willingness to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy Scale Among College Men and Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have used this measure to examine young adults' willingness to engage in CNM. Sizemore and Olmstead () tested the psychometric properties of this scale using a large sample ( N = 938) of college‐attending emerging adults. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis they found that items operated similarly for men and women, with the exception of the intercept for one item (“take on a third partner to join you in your relationship on equal terms”).…”
Section: Cnm Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have used this measure to examine young adults' willingness to engage in CNM. Sizemore and Olmstead () tested the psychometric properties of this scale using a large sample ( N = 938) of college‐attending emerging adults. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis they found that items operated similarly for men and women, with the exception of the intercept for one item (“take on a third partner to join you in your relationship on equal terms”).…”
Section: Cnm Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings on demographic antecedents of CNM are mixed. Some studies found no association between engagement in CNM and demographic factors such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, religious and political affiliation, and geographical location (Haupert et al, 2017; Lecuona et al, 2021; Moors, Gesselman, & Garcia, 2021; Rubin et al, 2014; Sizemore & Olmstead, 2017a; St. Vil et al, 2021). Other studies found that people who are White, younger, sexual minorities, men, nonbinary, transgender, and those who have more liberal political and religious views are more likely to engage in CNM and polyamory than their counterparts (Balzarini, Dharma, Kohut, Holmes, et al, 2019; Breslow et al, 2021; Cunningham et al, 2022; Kimberly & McGinley, 2019; Kolesar & Pardo, 2019; Levine et al, 2018; Moors, Gesselman, & Garcia, 2021; Wilt et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings on demographic antecedents of CNM are mixed. Some studies found no association between engagement in CNM and demographic factors such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, religious and political affiliation, and geographical location (Haupert et al, 2017;Lecuona et al, 2021;Moors, Gesselman, & Garcia, 2021;Rubin et al, 2014;Sizemore & Olmstead, 2017a;St. Vil et al, 2021).…”
Section: Antecedents Of Cnmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesmo os tipos de relacionamentos amorosos considerados modernos podem ter fundamentos em predisposições para relacionamentos duradouros, porém com maior número de parceiros sexuais e amorosos, como a poligamia. Estudos recentes mostram que indivíduos vivendo relacionamentos consensualmente não-monogâmicos (CNM) apresentam maiores atitudes positivas frente ao sexo sem compromisso e maior desejo sexual por pessoas que acabaram de conhecer que os indivíduos em relacionamentos monogâmicos Sizemore & Olmstead 2017). Além disso, em dois estudos realizados em países diferentes, indivíduos que se identificaram como heterossexuais, mulheres e homens tenderam a ser menos favoráveis aos relacionamentos CNM, que os homossexuais e plurissexuais (bissexuais, queer e transgênero) Costa & Ribeiro-Gonçalves 2020).…”
Section: Estratégias Sexuais Monogamia E Exclusividade Sexualunclassified

Bases ecológicas e evolutivas do comportamento humano

Paulino de Albuquerque,
Varella Valentova,
Correa Varella
2024