2002
DOI: 10.1080/713603030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone inhibit in vitro growth of human breast cancer cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
51
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that DHT predominantly exerted anti-proliferative effects on mitogenic effects of estrogens in breast carcinoma cells (Poulin et al 1988, Lapointe & Labrie 2001, although some divergent or inconsistent findings have been reported in the literature (Ortmann et al 2002, Somboonporn & Davis 2004. This inhibitory effect was associated with an increment of a proportion of cells in G 0 /G 1 phase or increased levels of p21 and/or p27 (Lapointe & Labrie 2001, Greeve et al 2004.…”
Section: K Takagi Et Al: Intratumoral Androgens In Breast Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that DHT predominantly exerted anti-proliferative effects on mitogenic effects of estrogens in breast carcinoma cells (Poulin et al 1988, Lapointe & Labrie 2001, although some divergent or inconsistent findings have been reported in the literature (Ortmann et al 2002, Somboonporn & Davis 2004. This inhibitory effect was associated with an increment of a proportion of cells in G 0 /G 1 phase or increased levels of p21 and/or p27 (Lapointe & Labrie 2001, Greeve et al 2004.…”
Section: K Takagi Et Al: Intratumoral Androgens In Breast Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast to the stimulatory effects on ER(K), PR(K), AR(C) MDA-MB-453 cells, androgen signaling has a predominantly growth inhibitory effect on ER(C), PR(C), AR(C) breast cancer cell lines (Poulin et al 1988, Birrell et al 1995, Ando et al 2002, Ortmann et al 2002, Cops et al 2008. Those findings are consistent with the clinical utility of androgenic agents as breast cancer therapies before the advent of tamoxifen (Fels 1944, The Cooperative Breast Cancer Group 1961, the favorable prognosis associated with AR expression in ER(C) breast cancers (Gonzalez-Angulo et al 2009, Castellano et al 2010, and the ability of AR to inhibit ER activity ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is currently unclear how to stratify individual breast cancers based on whether they will respond favourably to androgen treatment or not. In different breast cancer cell lines, modulation of androgen signalling can have growth-inhibitory or growth-promoting effects (Birrell et al 1995, Ortmann et al 2002, Greeve et al 2004, Lyu et al 2014, reviewed in Fioretti et al (2014), and this extends to the applicability of AR expression as a prognostic marker in specific subtypes of breast cancer (Kuenen-Boumeester et al 1996, Agoff et al 2003, Peters et al 2009, Kraus et al 2010, Gasparini et al 2014. Such conflicting reports/data raise concerns for the clinical efficacy of androgen modulation in breast cancer.…”
Section: Ar Expression In Mammary Epitheliummentioning
confidence: 99%