2015
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1400074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testosterone biases the amygdala toward social threat approach

Abstract: Testosterone administration in human participants increased amygdala responses during threat approach and decreased it during threat avoidance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This low-status prevention mechanism aligns with evidence suggesting that high-testosterone individuals are more comfortable in high-status positions and find low-status positions (e.g., defeat in competition) stressful and aversive Newman et al, 2005;Mehta et al, 2008). This interpretation is also consistent with growing evidence suggesting that exogenous testosterone administration in both men and women increases sensitivity to status threat cues and motivates dominant behaviors (e.g., van Honk et al, 2001;Hermans et al, 2006;Hermans et al, 2008;Wright et al, 2012;Bos et al, 2010Bos et al, , 2012Terburg et al, 2012;Boksem et al, 2013;Goetz et al, 2014;Enter et al, 2014;Radke et al, 2015;Mehta et al, 2015c). In contrast, low-testosterone individuals may find high-status positions uncomfortable and may actually prefer lower status as well as social cooperation (e.g., Wingfield et al, 1990;Josephs et al, 2006;Mehta et al, 2009;Wright et al, 2012;Edelstein et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This low-status prevention mechanism aligns with evidence suggesting that high-testosterone individuals are more comfortable in high-status positions and find low-status positions (e.g., defeat in competition) stressful and aversive Newman et al, 2005;Mehta et al, 2008). This interpretation is also consistent with growing evidence suggesting that exogenous testosterone administration in both men and women increases sensitivity to status threat cues and motivates dominant behaviors (e.g., van Honk et al, 2001;Hermans et al, 2006;Hermans et al, 2008;Wright et al, 2012;Bos et al, 2010Bos et al, , 2012Terburg et al, 2012;Boksem et al, 2013;Goetz et al, 2014;Enter et al, 2014;Radke et al, 2015;Mehta et al, 2015c). In contrast, low-testosterone individuals may find high-status positions uncomfortable and may actually prefer lower status as well as social cooperation (e.g., Wingfield et al, 1990;Josephs et al, 2006;Mehta et al, 2009;Wright et al, 2012;Edelstein et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…More specifically, testosterone's association with decision-making in the hawk-dove game may be explained by activity in neural regions implicated in threat processing (amygdala) as well as self-regulation and impulse control (orbitofrontal cortex). Testosterone enhances amygdala reactivity (Hermans et al, 2008;Gospic et al, 2011;Goetz et al, 2014;Radke et al, 2015), reduces orbitofrontal cortex activity (Mehta and Beer, 2010), and disrupts amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity in response to social threat cues (van Wingen et al, 2010;Volman et al, 2011). These neural mechanisms have all been associated with testosterone-dependent aggressive and dominant behaviors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings parallel evidence in women in which a single administration of T increases amygdala and hypothalamic reactivity to angry facial expressions (19)(20)(21). Notably, these subcortical brain structures are rich in both androgen and estrogen receptors (22)(23)(24) and play a key role in potentiating reactive aggression in animal models (1,25).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The finding that trait dominance and self-control both interacted with drug condition and explained unique variance in aggressive behavior suggests that distinct neural mechanisms may underlie the aggression-potentiating effects of T. It has been hypothesized that heightened amygdala reactivity to social signals of threat and/or social provocation may mediate the link between T and human aggression (3,27,(47)(48). Consistent with this idea, experimental work indicates that exogenous T potentiates amygdala reactivity to angry faces (18)(19)(20)(21), promotes prolonged eye gaze toward masked angry facial expressions (49), and heightened amygdala reactivity to social provocation positively predicts aggressive behavior (50). Notably, people scoring high on measures that tap into the construct of trait dominance (e.g., behavioral activation system; interpersonal/affective dimensions of psychopathy) also demonstrate heightened amygdala reactivity to angry facial expressions (51)(52) and demonstrate prolonged eye gaze toward masked angry faces (53).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%