2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests and analyses of a full-scale post-tensioned RCS frame subassembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A finite element model of composite frames was developed using shell elements (Bursi et al, 2005). An experimental model was used to evaluate the strength deterioration and damage propagation of RCS connections (Chou and Chen, 2010). Sustained damage to RCS connection in high seismic risk zoneswas investigated (Montesinos et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite element model of composite frames was developed using shell elements (Bursi et al, 2005). An experimental model was used to evaluate the strength deterioration and damage propagation of RCS connections (Chou and Chen, 2010). Sustained damage to RCS connection in high seismic risk zoneswas investigated (Montesinos et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent research on ''hybrid'' precast structural systems brought other forms of dissipators, including tension-only mild steel devices [6], external mounted mild steel devices [7,8], lead-based damping devices [9,10], and friction-based devices on the top and bottom surfaces of the beam ends [11]. More recently, Chou and Chen [12] conducted full-scale cyclic tests on a one-story two-bay post-tensioned reinforced concrete steel (RCS) frame subassembly with reduced flange plates and demonstrated the excellent self-centering capacity of the PT frames. Shake table tests [13] on a 0.4-scale one-story, two-by-two bay post-tensioned concretefilled tube (CFT) frame subassembly further confirmed the large deformation and self-centering ability of the PT frame systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have experimentally validated a Flag-Shaped (FS) hysteresis of the PT connection with good energy dissipation added to the postyield range as well as negligible stiffness and strength degradation [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. More recently, large-scale steel SC frame tests demonstrated good FS responses [10][11][12]. Beam buckling, which is a major mechanism for dissipating seismic energy in the MRF, was completely eliminated in the SC frame even after several cyclic loading tests [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, large-scale steel SC frame tests demonstrated good FS responses [10][11][12]. Beam buckling, which is a major mechanism for dissipating seismic energy in the MRF, was completely eliminated in the SC frame even after several cyclic loading tests [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%