2022
DOI: 10.1007/s41030-022-00204-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests and Indices Predicting Extubation Failure in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction There is lack of consensus on what constitutes best practice when assessing extubation readiness in children. This systematic review aims to synthesize data from existing literature on pre-extubation assessments and evaluate their diagnostic accuracies in predicting extubation failure (EF) in children. Methods A systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane was performed from inception of each database to 15 July 2021. Randomized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…evaluating the pre-extubation assessment and its diagnostic accuracy in predicting EF, 55 unique pre-extubation assessments were found to be poor predictors of EF. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…evaluating the pre-extubation assessment and its diagnostic accuracy in predicting EF, 55 unique pre-extubation assessments were found to be poor predictors of EF. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…An earlier study assessed the effects of the parameters of both preextubation patients and ventilators; however, it did not demonstrate any cutoff value or useful clinical implications for bedside care (2). Several parameters have been assessed individually, such as respiratory rate (RR), arterial blood gas, tidal volume (Vt) and maximum inspiratory pressure (3). Other parameters were assessed as collective indexes such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), pressure index, and CROP index to predict successful extubation (4)(5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%