2006
DOI: 10.1198/073500106000000297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for Cointegration Breakdown Over a Short Time Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
90
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The null hypothesis that cointegration prevails from 1951 to 2010 is, thus, tested against several alternative hypotheses of cointegration breakdowns. The p-values for P 2 P a ; P b ; P c f g and R 2 R a ; R b ; R c f g tests are computed using the parametric subsampling method suggested by Andrews and Kim (2006). The results suggest that both P c and R c statistics reject the null hypothesis of cointegration against the alternative hypothesis of cointegration breakdown during 1991-2010, though the evidence is mixed across OLS and FMOLS estimates.…”
Section: T Singhmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The null hypothesis that cointegration prevails from 1951 to 2010 is, thus, tested against several alternative hypotheses of cointegration breakdowns. The p-values for P 2 P a ; P b ; P c f g and R 2 R a ; R b ; R c f g tests are computed using the parametric subsampling method suggested by Andrews and Kim (2006). The results suggest that both P c and R c statistics reject the null hypothesis of cointegration against the alternative hypothesis of cointegration breakdown during 1991-2010, though the evidence is mixed across OLS and FMOLS estimates.…”
Section: T Singhmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Of these, P c has somewhat better size properties as compared to R c , while R c has power that is less variable across different distributions as compared to P c . On balance, Andrews and Kim (2006) prefer P c because of its somewhat better size properties as compared to R c .…”
Section: T Singhmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations