2002
DOI: 10.1353/mcb.2002.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests for Symmetric and Asymmetric Nonlinear Mean Reversion in Real Exchange Rates

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial evidence pointed towards the importance of these nonlinearities, but formal tests of unit roots against the alternative of nonlinear mean reversion were developed later. Sollis et al (2002) develop a formal test and find support for PPP in 6 out of 17 countries using post-1972 monthly RER data against the US-dollar. This evidence appears stronger for European countries against the DM, where they reject the unit root null in 8 out of 14 cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial evidence pointed towards the importance of these nonlinearities, but formal tests of unit roots against the alternative of nonlinear mean reversion were developed later. Sollis et al (2002) develop a formal test and find support for PPP in 6 out of 17 countries using post-1972 monthly RER data against the US-dollar. This evidence appears stronger for European countries against the DM, where they reject the unit root null in 8 out of 14 cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with the ESTR function, the structural change is an inner regime. The asymmetric ESTR suggested by Sollis et al (2002) has similar properties as the ESTR but it allows asymmetric scale parameters, 1 and 2 where I t = 1 if (t cT ) 0 and 0 otherwise. The transition function S t ( ) is also bounded from 0 to 1 when the 1 and 2 are su¢ ciently large values and if 1 6 = 2 the speed of transition is asymmetric either side of the mid-point cT:…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when supportive evidence for a stable RER could be found, the rate of convergence to the long-run equilibrium was usually surprisingly low (Rogoff 1996). This high degree of persistence in RERs has only been considered as satisfactorily addressed when some authors (e.g., Goldberg et al 1997;Michael et al 1997;Sarantis 1999;Taylor and Peel 2000;Taylor et al 2001;Sollis et al 2002;Liew et al 2003;Liew 2004) started to bring nonlinear adjustments to PPP. In general, all these studies show that RERs are characterized by strong nonlinearities, and conclude that economic forces driving mean-reversion are stronger the farther the RER is from its long-run equilibrium value.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%