1993
DOI: 10.1080/758527822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of covered interest parity on the Euromarket with high-quality data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the studies in Table 1, evidence for the validity of the IRP was given by Sharpe (1984) for Australia; Committeri, Rossi, and Santorelli (1993) for Italy, Germany, and the USA; Berument and Günay (2003) for Turkey; Chin and Liang (2009) for the USA, the UK, and Germany; Batten and Szilagyi (2010) for the USA and Japan; Guender and Cook (2011) for Australia and New Zealand; Kim and Cho (2011) for the USA, Japan, the UK, Singapore, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand; Lothian (2016) for 17 various countries. Meanwhile, the IRP hypothesis was proven to be invalid by the studies of Moosa (1996) for Australia and New Zealand; Francis et al (2002) for nine developing market economies; Adrangi et al (2007) for Korea, the Philippines, and Thailand; Mylonidis and Semertzidou (2010) for the USA, Canada, Australia, and Japan; Lily et al (2011) for Malaysia; Tse and Wald (2013) for 18 various countries and Fukuda (2016) for the USA and Japan.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies in Table 1, evidence for the validity of the IRP was given by Sharpe (1984) for Australia; Committeri, Rossi, and Santorelli (1993) for Italy, Germany, and the USA; Berument and Günay (2003) for Turkey; Chin and Liang (2009) for the USA, the UK, and Germany; Batten and Szilagyi (2010) for the USA and Japan; Guender and Cook (2011) for Australia and New Zealand; Kim and Cho (2011) for the USA, Japan, the UK, Singapore, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand; Lothian (2016) for 17 various countries. Meanwhile, the IRP hypothesis was proven to be invalid by the studies of Moosa (1996) for Australia and New Zealand; Francis et al (2002) for nine developing market economies; Adrangi et al (2007) for Korea, the Philippines, and Thailand; Mylonidis and Semertzidou (2010) for the USA, Canada, Australia, and Japan; Lily et al (2011) for Malaysia; Tse and Wald (2013) for 18 various countries and Fukuda (2016) for the USA and Japan.…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swapsatz (Report bzw. Deport) in% Zur empirischen Überprüfung dieser Theorie lässt sich seit den ersten empirischen Untersuchungen von Frenkel/Levich (1975 bis hin zu den neueren Studien wie beispielsweise die von Clinton (1988), Taylor (1989), Rhee/Chang (1992), Atkins (1993), Committeri/Rossi/Santorelli (1993); Thornton (1995); sowie Louis/Blenman/Thatcher (1999) 1) verwendet. In Blum et al (2001) wird zunächst für die Modellierung eines jeden Wechselkurses die jeweiligen zwei kurzfristigen Zinssätze beider Länder -unter der möglichen Berücksichtigung von stochastischen Ab-hängigkeiten2 zwischen den Zinssätzen -nach dem CIR-Modell…”
Section: Zinsparitäten-linieunclassified
“…-kredite fordert. Um diesem Vergleichsmaßstab in Hinblick auf das politische Risiko gerecht zu werden, wird daher in einigen empirischen Studien, wie beispielsweiseCommitteri!Rossi!Santorelli (1993);Rhee!Chang (1992); oderLouis/Bleuman!Thatcher (1999), der 'Euromarkt' für die einzelnen Kapitalanlagen bzw.Kapitalaufnahmen in den einzelnen Währungen herangezogen.…”
unclassified