2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.02029
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of Lorentz Invariance

Abstract: Lorentz invariance is a fundamental symmetry of both Einstein's theory of general relativity and quantum field theory. However, deviations from Lorentz invariance at energies approaching the Planck scale are predicted in many quantum gravity theories seeking to unify the force of gravity with the other three fundamental forces of matter. Even though any violations of Lorentz invariance are expected to be very small at observable energies, they can increase with energy and accumulate to detectable levels over l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(190 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for LIV based on TeV-PeV observations of GRB 221009A has also been claimed (although with caveats) [190]. However, the inferred values of E QG are in conflict some of the most stringent limits obtained [147,148,68] (See Table 3 of [21]). Furthermore, when one combines the data from these disparate datasets, which individually point to LIV, one does not get a consistent picture or a good fit to the combined data [172].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence for LIV based on TeV-PeV observations of GRB 221009A has also been claimed (although with caveats) [190]. However, the inferred values of E QG are in conflict some of the most stringent limits obtained [147,148,68] (See Table 3 of [21]). Furthermore, when one combines the data from these disparate datasets, which individually point to LIV, one does not get a consistent picture or a good fit to the combined data [172].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We should also mention that many other reviews focusing on observational tests of LIV have also been written over the years. A non-exhaustive list includes [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] (see also references therein). However, since this is a rapidly evolving field, this review will attempt to cover a few topics not mentioned in some of the aforementioned reviews.…”
Section: H(z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the constraints on the mass scale of Lorentz symmetry violation has been discussed based on the LHAASO data. In particular, Lorentz violation due to the subluminal scenario seems to be preferred, and the constraints on the mass scale are stronger in comparison with those that appear in literature [25][26][27][28][29]. One of the main reasons for considering Lorentz symmetry violation arises from the fact that the observed energy of gamma ray photons is significantly higher than the threshold value of pair-production interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given that LIV is expected to be amplified over cosmological distances, using high-redshift high-energy astronomical objects is key to trying to measure the small Planckian effect (at E << E Pl ). It is worth noting that studies on LIV effects have a long history in the field [3,4,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], for reviews on the topic, see [2,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%