2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2015.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of partially connected composite plate girders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with Yatim et al [18] the shear resistance of the steel plate girder VS can be evaluated by Eq. (14).…”
Section: Model 2 (Ml2)supporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with Yatim et al [18] the shear resistance of the steel plate girder VS can be evaluated by Eq. (14).…”
Section: Model 2 (Ml2)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…(Fig. 9 b) and c)) [18]. According to Table 7, the larger slab contribution to the overall shear strength is observed in girder G1C30, corresponding to a 71% resistance increasing when comparing with estimative from M4.…”
Section: Comparison Between Composite Design Methods and Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…View of a typical test set-up is shown in Figure 4. Nevertheless, only results for strains at specified load levels are presented in this paper whilst other results and properties of steel and concrete materials including details of the test procedure may be found in the reference (Yatim et al 2015). microstrain ( ) measured by strain gauge ST2 in the girder G1C20 at 600 kN.…”
Section: Instrumentation and Test Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%