1981
DOI: 10.2307/1937009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of the Assumptions Underlying Life Table Methods for Estimating Parameters from Cohort Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, several avian ecologists (Anderson et al ., 1981;Lakhani & Newton, 1983) noted that one of the main models used to estimate age-specific survival rates from recovery data of birds ringed as young is '... misleading, untrustworthy and gives a false sense of precision' (Anderson et al ., 1985, p. 97). These ecologists believe that the use of this model may account for the conclusions forwarded by earlier researchers that avian mortality is age independent (Botkin & Miller, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several avian ecologists (Anderson et al ., 1981;Lakhani & Newton, 1983) noted that one of the main models used to estimate age-specific survival rates from recovery data of birds ringed as young is '... misleading, untrustworthy and gives a false sense of precision' (Anderson et al ., 1985, p. 97). These ecologists believe that the use of this model may account for the conclusions forwarded by earlier researchers that avian mortality is age independent (Botkin & Miller, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-ratio analysis has fallen in and out of vogue in ecology (Hanson 1963, Caughley 1974, Anderson et al 1981, Skalski et al 2005) and recent applications have rekindled debate over the validity of demographic estimates derived from this approach because critical assumptions may be violated (Conn et al 2005, Ricklefs andRohwer 2005). Age ratios are often used as an index of reproduction in monitoring and management programs (Megrey 1989, McCullough et al 1994 Wanner et al 2004, Iverson et al 2004, Skalski et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pinnipeds, estimates of life‐history parameters can be obtained from cross‐sectional samples from animals collected for research, during subsistence harvests, or incidental to fisheries (Lander , Pitcher and Calkins , Boyd , York , Bester , Hammill and Gosselin , Lima and Páez ) but these data are often biased toward specific sex or age classes and can lead to misleading inferences (Anderson et al . , Messier , Menkens and Boyce ). Mark‐recapture studies of uniquely marked pinnipeds offer an alternative and often less biased method of estimating life‐history parameters and have become a more common method to estimate vital rates ( e.g ., Testa , Huber et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%