1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1996(87)80004-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tests of the performance of reduced-form exchange rate models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Boughton (1987), Woo (1985), Finn (1986), Somanath (1986), and Schinasi and Swamy (1989) have replicated the work of Meese and Rogoff (1984) by improving upon and estimating different versions of the rational-expectations form of the flexible-price model that include a partial adjustment term in money demand. Their work contributes to the literature in that they all successfully identify models that at times perform better than a random walk.…”
Section: Literature Review and Background Researchmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Boughton (1987), Woo (1985), Finn (1986), Somanath (1986), and Schinasi and Swamy (1989) have replicated the work of Meese and Rogoff (1984) by improving upon and estimating different versions of the rational-expectations form of the flexible-price model that include a partial adjustment term in money demand. Their work contributes to the literature in that they all successfully identify models that at times perform better than a random walk.…”
Section: Literature Review and Background Researchmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, most of those attempts have not achieved the desired results. Studies of Meese and Rogoff (1983), Frankel (1984), and Boughton (1987) suggest that no model is successful in explaining exchange rate fluctuations. This is particularly valid in regards to short term exchange rate movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boughton (1986) examines the performance of portfolio balance models in an out-of-sample forecasting experiment and concludes that they perform better than the random walk in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%