2020
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz3439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tethered peptide neurotoxins display two blocking mechanisms in the K + channel pore as do their untethered analogs

Abstract: We show here that membrane-tethered toxins facilitate the biophysical study of the roles of toxin residues in K+ channel blockade to reveal two blocking mechanisms in the K+ channel pore. The structure of the sea anemone type I (SAK1) toxin HmK is determined by NMR. T-HmK residues are scanned by point mutation to map the toxin surface, and seven residues are identified to be critical to occlusion of the KcsA channel pore. T-HmK–Lys22 is shown to interact with K+ ions traversing the KcsA pore from the cytoplasm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vitro synthesis and folding of venom-toxin peptides can be technically challenging, costly, and time-consuming. To facilitate characterization of C6 by mutational screening, we employed a strategy whereby C6, or its variants, were expressed from a gene in tethered form on the extracellular surface of cells via a glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored membrane-embedded leash, as we have before with other toxins ( 13 ). The construct included a signal peptide sequence, C6 or its variants, and a flexible linker, followed by a GPI targeting sequence ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The in vitro synthesis and folding of venom-toxin peptides can be technically challenging, costly, and time-consuming. To facilitate characterization of C6 by mutational screening, we employed a strategy whereby C6, or its variants, were expressed from a gene in tethered form on the extracellular surface of cells via a glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored membrane-embedded leash, as we have before with other toxins ( 13 ). The construct included a signal peptide sequence, C6 or its variants, and a flexible linker, followed by a GPI targeting sequence ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using point mutations, we identified five residues in the hHv1 S3–S4 loop that alter the free energy of blockade (ΔΔG) by more than 2 kcal/mol and that we therefore characterize as important for C6 binding. Taking advantage of a membrane-tethered toxin method ( 13 ), we scanned 35 noncysteine residues in tethered C6 (T-C6) and identified 7 that also significantly decrease affinity. We also show that C6 partitions most readily into lipid membranes that contain negatively charged phospholipids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative binding mode that does not involve a pore-inserting lysine was deduced for Shk-Dap22, an analog with increased selectivity for Kv1.3, developed as immunosuppressant 39 . Recently, a similar mechanism was identified for the parental toxin, using a novel tethered-toxin methodology 40 . Further, the recent suggestion that the classical pore-blocker CTX wobbles between several bound conformations, further imply that the various K + blocking mechanisms portrayed above are not mutually exclusive, and may co-exist, albeit at different potencies, for a given peptide-channel interacting pair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An alternative binding mode that does not involve a pore-inserting lysine was deduced for Shk-Dap22, an analog with increased selectivity for Kv1.3, developed as immunosuppressant 39 . Recently, a similar mechanism was identified for the parental toxin and for peptides designed on its scaffold, using phage-display and a novel tethered-toxin methodology 40,41 . Further, the recent suggestion that the classical pore-blocker CTX wobbles between several bound conformations, further imply that the various K + blocking mechanisms portrayed above are not mutually exclusive, and may co-exist, albeit at different potencies, for a given peptide-channel interacting pair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%