The MAK‐Collection for Occupational Health and Safety 2017
DOI: 10.1002/3527600418.mb12718d0063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetrachlorethen [MAK Value Documentation in German language, 2017]

Abstract: The German Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area has re‐evaluated tetrachloroethylene [127‐18‐4] to derive a maximum concentration at the workplace (MAK value), considering all toxicity endpoints. Available study reports and publications are described in detail. Results from human studies do not point to a genotoxic potential of tetrachloroethylene. In vitro and in vivo studies in mammalian cells do not show a distinct genotoxic potential. From epid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, poor recovery seemed to level-out above higher aliquots of 2.2, 1.8, 1.3 and 1.3 nmol (PCE, TCE, cDCE and tDCE), which was assigned as the minimum quantification limit (MQL) of CE for the presented measurement setup and represents a compound molar ratio of 105, 84, 64 and 63 nmol mol -1 , when sorbent tubes were loaded at a flow rate of 50 ml min -1 over a sampling time of 10 minutes. Such MQL render sufficient sensitivity for ambient air monitoring applications (Hartwig, 2017;Maceira et al, 2017;Ras-Mallorquí et al, 2007;Woolfenden, 1997). The relative standard deviation for mass recovery of each compound and calibration standard agreed with previous recommendations of less than 10% (Bianchi and Varney, 1993).…”
Section: Calibration Of Chlorinated Ethenes Using Sorbent Tubessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, poor recovery seemed to level-out above higher aliquots of 2.2, 1.8, 1.3 and 1.3 nmol (PCE, TCE, cDCE and tDCE), which was assigned as the minimum quantification limit (MQL) of CE for the presented measurement setup and represents a compound molar ratio of 105, 84, 64 and 63 nmol mol -1 , when sorbent tubes were loaded at a flow rate of 50 ml min -1 over a sampling time of 10 minutes. Such MQL render sufficient sensitivity for ambient air monitoring applications (Hartwig, 2017;Maceira et al, 2017;Ras-Mallorquí et al, 2007;Woolfenden, 1997). The relative standard deviation for mass recovery of each compound and calibration standard agreed with previous recommendations of less than 10% (Bianchi and Varney, 1993).…”
Section: Calibration Of Chlorinated Ethenes Using Sorbent Tubessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The perpendicular end of the T , facing downwards at an angle of 30 • , was used as an injection port for liquid or gaseous calibration standard aliquots and was sealed with a 3 mm PTFE-coated silicon septa. Injected calibration standard aliquots were directed through the sorbent tubes, providing a continuous nitrogen flow (purity 5.0) of 20 mL min −1 for 25 min, similar to previously described approaches (Hartwig, 2017;U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999b).…”
Section: Preparation Of Calibration Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was assigned as the minimum quantification limit (MQL) for mixing ratios and stable carbon isotope ratios of CE for the presented measurement setup and represented a compound molar ratio of 105, 84, 64 and 63 nmol mol −1 , if sorbent tubes were loaded at a flow rate of 50 mL min −1 over a sampling time of 10 min. Such MQL represents a sufficient sensitivity for ambient air monitoring applications (Hartwig, 2017;Maceira et al, 2017;Ras-Mallorquí et al, 2007;Woolfenden, 1997).…”
Section: Calibration Of Chlorinated Ethenes Using Sorbent Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sampling time helps avoid problems caused by the rapid initial wash-out phase after the end of exposure (see Section 10.3). Meanwhile, the MAK value for tetrachloroethylene has been set at 10 mL/m 3 , which makes it possible to derive a corresponding BAT value (Hartwig 2017).…”
Section: Addendum To Tetrachloroethylenementioning
confidence: 99%