2009
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02206-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetracycline Resistome of the Organic Pig Gut

Abstract: The occurrence of genes conferring resistance to tetracyclines in the organic pig gut was assessed through the metagenomic approach. Of 9,000 bacterial artificial chromosome clones analyzed, 10 were identified as carrying the known tet(C), tet(W), and tet(40) genes, as well as novel genes encoding resistance to the tetracyclines minocycline and doxycycline. The latter are different from the known tet genes and are homologous to genes encoding UDP-glucose 4-epimerases, with the domain structure characteristic f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight organic and three feral swine isolates did not have detectable tet genes ( Table 4), suggesting that their resistance genes have minor sequence differences in regions targeted by the PCR primers (13) or represent a tet class not targeted in this study (5,10,21). Most CTC-resistant swine isolates (99/ 110) were positive in PCR assays for tet genes (Table 4).…”
Section: In Pcr Assays Targeting Classes Tet(a) To Tet(e) Tet(g) Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight organic and three feral swine isolates did not have detectable tet genes ( Table 4), suggesting that their resistance genes have minor sequence differences in regions targeted by the PCR primers (13) or represent a tet class not targeted in this study (5,10,21). Most CTC-resistant swine isolates (99/ 110) were positive in PCR assays for tet genes (Table 4).…”
Section: In Pcr Assays Targeting Classes Tet(a) To Tet(e) Tet(g) Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6B) soils, suggest that resistance to the tested antibiotics may be associated with transposons (20). It is unclear whether this indicates selection of resistant resident members of the soil community, proliferation of bacteria introduced via manure amendments, and/or dissemination of mobile genetic elements and horizontal gene transfer (5,6,12,16,17,28).…”
Section: ) and Erm(c) Erm(v) Erm(x) Msr(a) Ole(b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, activity-based functional screening of metagenomic libraries, which provide direct evidence for antibiotic resistant phenotype, still remains a critical means to discover novel ARGs and identify their function that could be missed when using sequence based analysis only. Using functional screening of metagenomic libraries, novel functional ARGs have been identified from human microbiome (Sommer et al, 2009), organic pig gut (Kazimierczak et al, 2009), activated sludge (Mori et al, 2008) and soils (Allen et al, 2009;Lang et al, 2010;McGarvey et al, 2012). Most of these ARGs have not been identified previously and are evolutionarily distant from known resistance genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%