1984
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6318262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tetrahydrocannabinol vs. prochlorperazine. The effects of two antiemetics on patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Abstract: The authors tested the effectiveness of orally administered delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) as compared to prochlorperazine for the alleviation of symptoms, such as vomiting and nausea, experienced by patients receiving radiotherapy. The test subjects rated the severity of their illness, as well as the extent of their subsequent moods, their level of concentration, their amount of physical activity, and their desire for social interaction. They chose the drug they preferred and recorded its side effects. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These provided the basis for the new proposed guidelines discussed by the experts and described below. There are three RCTs in patients with fractionated radiotherapy [24,29,39] and one with single-fraction radiotherapy [18] investigating the efficacy of non-5-HT 3 antagonists in radiotherapy of the upper abdomen. There was no difference among the various compounds used, and the antiemetic efficacy was limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These provided the basis for the new proposed guidelines discussed by the experts and described below. There are three RCTs in patients with fractionated radiotherapy [24,29,39] and one with single-fraction radiotherapy [18] investigating the efficacy of non-5-HT 3 antagonists in radiotherapy of the upper abdomen. There was no difference among the various compounds used, and the antiemetic efficacy was limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first study, 39 patients were randomised to receive oral metoclopramide or nabilone. In the second, 89 patients were treated with oral metoclopramide, prochlorperazine or placebo, and in the third, 11 patients received tetrahydrocannabinol or prochlorperazine [24,29,39]. Only one randomised study has been carried out with 43 patients submitted to single-fraction palliative radiotherapy to the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.…”
Section: Randomised Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cancer patients, administration of oral Δ 9 -THC has been shown to significantly suppress the experience of nausea and vomiting, in comparison to placebo controls (Chang et al, 1979; Frytak et al, 1979; Orr et al, 1980; Sallan et al, 1975; Sweet et al, 1981) and when compared to the D 2 receptor antagonists available at the time, Δ 9 -THC was at least as effective (Carey et al, 1983; Crawford and Buckman, 1986; Cunningham et al, 1988; Frytak et al, 1979; Tramèr et al, 2001; Ungerleider et al, 1984) if not more effective (Ekert et al, 1979; Orr and McKernan, 1981) at reducing nausea and vomiting. Clinical evidence suggests that Δ 8 -THC suppresses anticipatory nausea in child patients (Abrahamov et al, 1995).…”
Section: Cannabinoids and Endocannabinoids In The Control Of Nausementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first study, 39 patients were randomized to receive oral metoclopramide or nabilone. In the second, 89 patients were treated with oral metoclopramide, prochlorperazine or placebo, and in the third, 11 patients received tetrahydrocannabinol or prochlorperazine [7,9,35,44]. Only one randomized study has been carried out with 43 patients submitted to single-fraction palliative radiotherapy to the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.…”
Section: Prophylaxis With Non-5-ht 3 Receptor Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%