2020 3rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Computer Engineering: Machine Learning and Internet of Things (IC 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icetce48199.2020.9091774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text Classification on Twitter Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harjule et al implemented multinomial Naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine and RNN on already categorized data sets to perform sentiment analysis. In this paper, seperate topic modelling algorithm is applied to automatically categorize the data set, and further classification algorithms are implemented [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harjule et al implemented multinomial Naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine and RNN on already categorized data sets to perform sentiment analysis. In this paper, seperate topic modelling algorithm is applied to automatically categorize the data set, and further classification algorithms are implemented [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors studied the use of two machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) and found that SVM performed best in classifying the accident narratives. Multinomial Naive Bayes (MNB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines were also deployed in [21] to prediction task on Twitter Data.…”
Section: Related Work On Text Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SVM were not suitable for the five classifications in this study because it is basically suitable for two classes of classification. [16][17][18] The results of the overall evaluation and the labeled results are shown in Table 5. The % result is the value for each rating and item divided by the overall number 2,392.…”
Section: Machine Learning Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%