2008
DOI: 10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.10.2536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text-Independent Speaker Verification Using Artificially Generated GMMs for Cohorts

Abstract: This paper presents a text-independent speaker verification method using Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), where only utterances of enrolled speakers are required. Artificial cohorts are used instead of those from speaker databases, and GMMs for artificial cohorts are generated by changing model parameters of the GMM for a claimed speaker. Equal error rates by the proposed method are about 60% less than those by a conventional method which also uses only utterances of enrolled speakers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, after a brief introduction of GMM, we review the previous method to generate GMMs for artificial cohorts [6]. A mixture of K Gaussian distributions is described as…”
Section: Previous Artificial Cohort Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, after a brief introduction of GMM, we review the previous method to generate GMMs for artificial cohorts [6]. A mixture of K Gaussian distributions is described as…”
Section: Previous Artificial Cohort Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of mixtures for GMM is 16, and the number of cohorts used are 50 for both real and artificial cohorts, both of which follow [6]. Given the likelihood for a claimed speaker p s (Y) and that for an other speaker among 99 speakers p i (Y), the speaker i is selected as a member of 50 cohorts for the claimed speaker if the difference of likelihood |p s (Y) − p i (Y)| is within the smallest 50 among 99.…”
Section: Speaker Verification Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations