2009
DOI: 10.1080/01494920903224269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
1
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
97
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…49.8% (N=106) of participants said they did not feel pressured to text their significant other throughout the day, suggesting that, although perpetual contact has made it possible for couples to text at all times, participants felt able to go without that kind of connection. This finding was supported by the previous research done by Pettigrew in 2009. His conclusion matched the researchers': individuals were able to "use text messaging to both assert autonomy and to maintain connectedness with their relational partners" (p.697).…”
Section: Social Penetration Theorysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49.8% (N=106) of participants said they did not feel pressured to text their significant other throughout the day, suggesting that, although perpetual contact has made it possible for couples to text at all times, participants felt able to go without that kind of connection. This finding was supported by the previous research done by Pettigrew in 2009. His conclusion matched the researchers': individuals were able to "use text messaging to both assert autonomy and to maintain connectedness with their relational partners" (p.697).…”
Section: Social Penetration Theorysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Individuals were able to "use text messaging to both assert autonomy and to maintain connectedness with their relational partners" (p.697). However, studies have found there are strong differences in the text messaging patterns, content, and mutual understanding when looking at non-romantic dyads versus romantic pairs; the text messages are interpreted in different ways when sent to different partners (Pettigrew, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when interviewed about their feelings of connectedness via texting, most people had something positive to report about texting, such as texting allowed them to stay connected to their partner and yet also maintain autonomy at the same time, texting was more private and perpetual than talking on the phone, and in general, texting made the relationship more enjoyable and closer (Pettigrew, 2009). Other self-report studies further confirmed that texting particularly benefits young, single, and socially anxious mobile phone users, enabling them to enrich their personal relationships in ways that might otherwise be denied to them (Reid & Reid, 2010).…”
Section: Texting and Romantic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Haythornthwaite's (2005) ideas about media multiplexity suggest that strong-tie relationships such as friendships are in part defined by the use of multiple communication technologies for interaction. Katz and Aakhus's (2002) notion of perpetual contact is rooted in the premise that new communication technologies (particularly mobile phones) have created opportunities for individuals to be accessible-and expectations that they will be accessible (Pettigrew, 2009)-to one another at virtually all times. Both of these ideas have direct implications for scholarship examining self-disclosure in personal relationships.…”
Section: Self-disclosure and New Communication Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%