2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10761-022-00680-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text Mining Oral Histories in Historical Archaeology

Abstract: Advances in text mining and natural language processing methodologies have the potential to productively inform historical archaeology and oral history research. However, text mining methods are largely developed in the context of contemporary big data and publicly available texts, limiting the applicability of these tools in the context of historical and archaeological interpretation. Given the ability of text analysis to efficiently process and analyze large volumes of data, the potential for such tools to m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our custom stopword list included terms such as 'interviewed', 'they'd', 'yeah', and the names of the interviewers and interviewees. The full stopword list is included in the Appendix and article GitHub repository (Brown and Shackel 2023). Finally, we further standardised the words and bigrams in terms of tense, parts of speech, and plurality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our custom stopword list included terms such as 'interviewed', 'they'd', 'yeah', and the names of the interviewers and interviewees. The full stopword list is included in the Appendix and article GitHub repository (Brown and Shackel 2023). Finally, we further standardised the words and bigrams in terms of tense, parts of speech, and plurality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annotating these terms based on expertise in the field and then using these categories as a framework for further analyses combines the qualitative and quantitative aspects of interpreting texts. In support of open and reproducible science, these tagging libraries and stopword lists are available in the Appendix and online in the project GitHub repository (Brown and Shackel 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%