2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-4906(01)00018-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Textbooks, contexts, and learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the abundance of research on materials development/design (see Tomlinson, 2012) and content analysis of materials, there has been much less research investigating how materials are actually used by teachers and students in language classroom interactions and how they influence classroom discourse (e.g., Canagarajah, 1993;Guerrettaz & Johnston, 2013;Opoku-Amankwa, 2010;Thoms, 2014;Yakhontova, 2001). Yet, there has been work relevant to the issue of materials use in L2 classrooms (albeit materials use is not the major focus of these studies) from various perspectives, such as classroom ethnography (e.g., Duff, 1995) and multimodal conversation analytic studies (e.g., Hasegawa, 2018;Hellermann & Pekarek Doehler, 2010;Kunitz & Skogmyr Marian, 2017;Majlesi, 2018;Markee, 2011).…”
Section: Materials Use In L2 Classroom Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the abundance of research on materials development/design (see Tomlinson, 2012) and content analysis of materials, there has been much less research investigating how materials are actually used by teachers and students in language classroom interactions and how they influence classroom discourse (e.g., Canagarajah, 1993;Guerrettaz & Johnston, 2013;Opoku-Amankwa, 2010;Thoms, 2014;Yakhontova, 2001). Yet, there has been work relevant to the issue of materials use in L2 classrooms (albeit materials use is not the major focus of these studies) from various perspectives, such as classroom ethnography (e.g., Duff, 1995) and multimodal conversation analytic studies (e.g., Hasegawa, 2018;Hellermann & Pekarek Doehler, 2010;Kunitz & Skogmyr Marian, 2017;Majlesi, 2018;Markee, 2011).…”
Section: Materials Use In L2 Classroom Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet only two classroom‐based studies that we are aware of, Canagarajah () and Yakhontova (), focus squarely on the general pedagogical use of second language materials in actual classrooms. Both authors examined the use of global ELT textbooks in non‐Western contexts (see also Dendrinos, ; Gray, , ).…”
Section: Materials In Language Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canagarajah () found that the communicative pedagogy of the Western ELT textbook used in his classroom was resisted by Tamil learners in Sri Lanka, who showed greater enthusiasm for grammar‐focused activities. Yakhontova () found that while Ukrainian learners reacted positively overall to novel language‐learning goals and methods used in an American textbook, they responded negatively to the lack of familiar cultural references. Thus, both researchers conclude that such use of materials devalues local teachers and the knowledge they bring to the classroom, and induces “cultural estrangement” as students fail to engage with the alien cultures represented in the materials (Canagarajah, , p. 615).…”
Section: Materials In Language Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first Polish‐English studies carried out at a discourse level were conducted by Duszak (1994; 1997). Interestingly, authors from other central‐east European countries came up with similar results when such Slavic languages as Czech, Ukrainian and Russian were compared with academic writing patterns in English (Čmejrková and Daneš ; Yakhontova 2001; 2002; for an overview see: Petrić ). Although the outcomes from these first studies were described as speculative rather than scientific facts (Duszak ), they included important observations which allowed some generalizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%