2021
DOI: 10.2174/1573405617999210112195450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture Analysis in the Evaluation of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Chest X-Ray Images: A Proof of Concept Study

Abstract: Background: One of the most challenging aspects related to Covid-19 is to establish the presence of infection in early phase of the disease. Texture analysis might be an additional tool for the evaluation of Chest X-ray in patients with clinical suspicion of Covid-19 related pneumonia. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of texture analysis and machine learning models for the diagnosis of Covid-19 interstitial pneumonia in Chest X-ray images. Methods: Chest X-ray images were accessed from a p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method with Res-net 34 achieved 98.33% accuracy. Armando Ugo Cavallo et al [ 13 ] extracted 308 texture features per ROI from chest X-ray and analyzed pneumonia infection in COVID-19 patients using machine-learning models. Metaheuristic algorithms [ 14 ] are becoming more popular because they do not require gradient information, have ability to avoid entrapment into local optima, and are utilized to solve complex optimization problems efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method with Res-net 34 achieved 98.33% accuracy. Armando Ugo Cavallo et al [ 13 ] extracted 308 texture features per ROI from chest X-ray and analyzed pneumonia infection in COVID-19 patients using machine-learning models. Metaheuristic algorithms [ 14 ] are becoming more popular because they do not require gradient information, have ability to avoid entrapment into local optima, and are utilized to solve complex optimization problems efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models showing an accuracy higher of 60% were selected and ensembled using a voting scheme assuming both cross-validation accuracy and confidence (i.e., distance from classification margin) as a vote weight. Ensembling was performed according to Cavallo et al [ 12 ]. Briefly, for the images classified as derived from subjects with Hypertension (HTN), the scores (the products of model accuracy and classification confidences) were left as is, while for each Controls (NC) classification the scores were multiplied by −1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 individual classification models were also "ensembled" according to a voting scheme that used both the cross-validation accuracy and the confidence (i.e., distance from classification margin) as a vote weight. Ensembling was executed in accordance with Troisi et al [56,57,[62][63][64][65]. In brief, for samples identified as "CRC", the scores (obtained by multiplying the model cross-validation accuracy and classification confidence) were used as is, whereas the scores of "CTRL" samples were multiplied by −1.…”
Section: Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%