2008
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture analysis of raw and cooked tubers of short‐duration lines of cassava by multivariate and fractional conversion techniques

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cassava tubers are mainly consumed after boiling in water. Their cooking quality depends on the variety, maturity, growing conditions and physicochemical and starch properties. In this study the textural and gelatinisation characteristics of ten short-duration lines of cassava were assessed. Textural changes due to cooking were modelled by fractional conversion techniques and correlated with gelatinisation and physicochemical properties by principal component analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that for the same variety, the values of A and B are same, but among the varieties the values were different, registering a minimum value of 102.8 for 'H152' and maximum of 111.7 for 'Venjaramoodan'. Similar results were also reported for carrot (A=114.9, B=115.1) and radish (A=116.3, B=116.0) by Ramesh et al (1997) and for cassava tubers of short duration varieties (A=105.7-127.5, B=105.7-127.5) by Sajeev et al (2008). The validity of such models was ascertained by estimating the modulus values as explained by Ramesh et al (1997) and is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth mentioning that for the same variety, the values of A and B are same, but among the varieties the values were different, registering a minimum value of 102.8 for 'H152' and maximum of 111.7 for 'Venjaramoodan'. Similar results were also reported for carrot (A=114.9, B=115.1) and radish (A=116.3, B=116.0) by Ramesh et al (1997) and for cassava tubers of short duration varieties (A=105.7-127.5, B=105.7-127.5) by Sajeev et al (2008). The validity of such models was ascertained by estimating the modulus values as explained by Ramesh et al (1997) and is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, as explained earlier, the varietal dependence on the constants necessitated the development of a generalized model without giving weightage to individual varieties i.e., by considering these data as a whole for cassava tubers. The linear regression of the total data gave the value of A as 104.5 and B as 93.7, which were found to be lower than that of the short duration lines of cassava for which Sajeev et al (2008) got A=113.0 and B=110.8. When this general model was compared with the individual models, the modulus values were all below 5%, also showing extremely good fit to explain the variation of relative firmness with degree of cooking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations