2008
DOI: 10.1002/adem.200800102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture Evolution During Bending of a Single Crystal Copper Nanowire Studied by EBSD and Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the spot shapes are significantly different: the spots for S1 are circular, while those corresponding to S5 are ellipsoidal. Similar results have been reported for copper (Weber et al, 2008) and InAs nanowires (Jangir et al, 2017). The ellipsoidal spots have been attributed by these authors to the bending or strain field that develops inside the longer NWs, which control the nanowire merging by mutual misorientation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the spot shapes are significantly different: the spots for S1 are circular, while those corresponding to S5 are ellipsoidal. Similar results have been reported for copper (Weber et al, 2008) and InAs nanowires (Jangir et al, 2017). The ellipsoidal spots have been attributed by these authors to the bending or strain field that develops inside the longer NWs, which control the nanowire merging by mutual misorientation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A 23 lm long single-crystalline copper nanowire was produced by focused ion beam fabrication (FIB) [176]. The average cross-section of the specimen was 750 Â 750 nm 2 .…”
Section: Texture and Dislocation Density Evolution In A Bent Single-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stress-strain curves and texture predictions of polycrystals, local models have been shown to be powerful and efficient [108]. However, when the simulation scale becomes smaller such as in studies focusing on nanoindentation [170,171,174], micropillar compression [172], or small-scale beam bending [176], local models can be insufficient due to their inability to describe mechanical size effects.…”
Section: Introduction Of Geometrically Necessary Dislocationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other physics-based models that also include the geometrically necessary dislocation density, grain size, and grain boundary information directly into the model. These models can effectively simulate the small-scale deformation, such as nano-indentation [29,30], micropillar compression [31], and micro-beam bending [32].…”
Section: Physics-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%