2019
DOI: 10.1111/jtxs.12472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Texture‐modified 3D printed dark chocolate: Sensory evaluation and consumer perception study

Abstract: This study aimed to assess the preferences and perceptions of texture‐modified three‐dimensional (3D) printed chocolate through three measures: two tasting tests and one survey. In the first test, 30 semitrained panelists ranked their overall preference from among the three samples of chocolate printed in a honeycomb pattern with infill percentages (IPs) of 25, 50, and 100%. The panelists ranked the samples based on appearance and hardness. In the second test, the same panelists nominated one preference betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to the formation of empty spaces during the deposition of layers. In 2019, Mantihal et al presented three samples of chocolate printed in a honeycomb pattern with infill percentages of 25%, 50%, and 100% [98] to 30 semi-trained panelists. The panel preferred their 3D printed chocolate with 25% infill because of its relative softness.…”
Section: Materials For 3d Food Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to the formation of empty spaces during the deposition of layers. In 2019, Mantihal et al presented three samples of chocolate printed in a honeycomb pattern with infill percentages of 25%, 50%, and 100% [98] to 30 semi-trained panelists. The panel preferred their 3D printed chocolate with 25% infill because of its relative softness.…”
Section: Materials For 3d Food Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printing is also enabling the creation of drug delivery materials, with pediatric-friendly chocolate-based acetaminophen and ibuprofen having been successfully produced, and capsaicin candy for oral ulcer treatment. [41][42][43] Working toward rehabilitation of pharyngeal weakness or incoordination, speech and swallowing therapists may choose strength-or skill-based rehabilitation models. Strength-based training utilizes exercises designed to increase bolus driving forces through the pharynx such as the effortful swallow or the Masako maneuver.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work developing 3D‐printed foods, improved flavor/altered texture, and “shaped” but texture‐altered foods are aimed at improving the appeal of eating while maintaining favorable rheology. 3D printing is also enabling the creation of drug delivery materials, with pediatric‐friendly chocolate‐based acetaminophen and ibuprofen having been successfully produced, and capsaicin candy for oral ulcer treatment 41–43 …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many food products have already been developed using 3D printing: chocolate structures (Lipton, Cutler, Nigl, Cohen, & Lipson, 2015; Mantihal, Prakash, & Bhandari, 2019a, 2019b; Mantihal, Prakash, Godoi, & Bhandari, 2019), cereal‐based foods with probiotics (Zhang, Lou, & Schutyser, 2018), cereal‐based snacks fortified with insects (Severini, Azzollini, Albenzio, & Derossi, 2018), dough (Liu et al, 2019), egg and rice flour blends (Anukiruthika, Moses, & Anandharamakrishnan, 2020), fruit leather (Azam, Zhang, Mujumdar, & Yang, 2018), processed cheese (Le Tohic et al, 2018), smoothies using a blend of fruit and vegetables (Severini, Derossi, Ricci, Caporizzi, & Fiore, 2018). Of these studies, only two investigated the sensory properties of the 3D printed products (Mantihal, Prakash, & Bhandari, 2019b; Severini, Derossi, et al, 2018); and neither study evaluated the 3D printed products using trained panelists, as will be completed in this study. These studies used consumers to evaluate the 3D food items; this study will use trained panelists to evaluate the sensory properties of 3D printed food products objectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, dough (Liu et al, 2019), egg and rice flour blends (Anukiruthika, Moses, & Anandharamakrishnan, 2020), fruit leather (Azam, Zhang, Mujumdar, & Yang, 2018), processed cheese (Le Tohic et al, 2018), smoothies using a blend of fruit and vegetables (Severini, Derossi, Ricci, Caporizzi, & Fiore, 2018). Of these studies, only two investigated the sensory properties of the 3D printed products (Mantihal, Prakash, & Bhandari, 2019b;; and neither study evaluated the 3D printed products using trained panelists, as will be completed in this study. These studies used consumers to evaluate the 3D food items; this study will use trained panelists to evaluate the sensory properties of 3D printed food products objectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%