2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.10.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TG/DSC analysis of Fe8(OOH)16Cl1.3 nanospindles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the diffraction peaks shown in Fig. 6b can be indexed as Fe 8 (OOH) 16 Cl 1.3 (Akaganeite-M) with a monoclinic structure [22], which are consistent with the values in the literature (JCPDS No: 42-1315). When the reaction time increased to 2 h, in addition to Fe 8 (OOH) 16 Cl 1.3 , ␣-FeOOH with a monoclinic structure is also formed (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All the diffraction peaks shown in Fig. 6b can be indexed as Fe 8 (OOH) 16 Cl 1.3 (Akaganeite-M) with a monoclinic structure [22], which are consistent with the values in the literature (JCPDS No: 42-1315). When the reaction time increased to 2 h, in addition to Fe 8 (OOH) 16 Cl 1.3 , ␣-FeOOH with a monoclinic structure is also formed (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…According to the literatures, the mass loss in the range from room temperature to 200 C is due to the dehydration of free water molecule while that in the temperature range of 200-300 C resulted from the dehydration of coordinated water molecules. [25][26][27][28] The mass loss in step-3 is mainly caused by dihydroxylation [29][30][31] or oxidation of chemisorbed hydrgen. Hence, one can see that more and more coordinated water molecules are formed and the conductance baseline of the sensor increases continuously [ Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%