2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Th(IV) transport from nitrate media through hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the configurations showed signs of membrane instability after 3 h. When running the process in HFSLM configuration, the total molar flux is lower while the yttrium molar fraction in the stripping becomes higher. Higher molar flux in HFRLM as compared to HFSLM is in accordance with previous studies on Th 24 and on extraction of Cu(II) from HCl using D2HEPA as the carrier. 29,31 The enhanced mass transfer in HFRLM could be due to the larger amount of liquid membrane phase extending the accumulation period, during which the mass transfer resistance is potentially lower.…”
Section: Comparison Of Configurations 341 Hfrlm and Hfslm Operating I...supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…None of the configurations showed signs of membrane instability after 3 h. When running the process in HFSLM configuration, the total molar flux is lower while the yttrium molar fraction in the stripping becomes higher. Higher molar flux in HFRLM as compared to HFSLM is in accordance with previous studies on Th 24 and on extraction of Cu(II) from HCl using D2HEPA as the carrier. 29,31 The enhanced mass transfer in HFRLM could be due to the larger amount of liquid membrane phase extending the accumulation period, during which the mass transfer resistance is potentially lower.…”
Section: Comparison Of Configurations 341 Hfrlm and Hfslm Operating I...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the HFRLM configuration, organic solution is soaked into the membrane support and also uniformly dispersed into the aqueous strip solution in order to compensate for the loss of organics into the aqueous phase. This improves the long-term membrane stability, accelerates the mass transfer, and leads to improved operation . The stability of HFRLM and the parameters affecting the selectivity and transport rates through the membrane have been explored in different applications, e.g., thorium recovery from aqueous waste, , extraction of copper­(II) and cobalt­(II) from waste water, and separation of Nd­(III) from mixed REE. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium constant of eqn 14is 0.6. 24 In our previous work, 25 the parameters of empirical correlations for k R and k s , mentioned in eqn (12) and 13, were modied and have been used in this study. In addition D eff has been considered as equal to 9.2 Â 10 À11 m 2 s À1 due to the following equation:…”
Section: Th 4þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the mass transfer resistance in the tube side is higher than the shell side, which is in agreement with our previous study. 25 Enhancement of the tube side velocity causes a decrease in the renewal layer thickness and an increase in the renewal rate of organic layer at the inner surface of hollow ber, which leads to an increase in the local mass transport coefficient. Furthermore, Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Ow Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between SLM and LLX systems are as follows: unlike a LLX system, in a SLM process, extraction and stripping processes are carried out in a single stage and a carrier was used within a solid porous membrane is impregnated, as its consumption is less than the amount used in a LLX system. Moreover, easy operation, lower consumption of energy, ease of scaling up, and low investment are the other advantages of SLM systems (Ammari Allahyari et al 2016;Duan et al 2017b;Jahanmahin et al 2016;Swain et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%