1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80218-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thalamic Relay of Spontaneous Retinal Activity Prior to Vision

Abstract: Before vision, retinal ganglion cells produce spontaneous waves of action potentials. A crucial question is whether this spontaneous activity is transmitted to lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons. Using a novel in vitro preparation, we report that LGN neurons receive periodic barrages of postsynaptic currents from the retina that drive them to fire bursts of action potentials. Groups of LGN neurons are highly correlated in their firing. Experiments in wild-type and NMDAR1 knockout mice show that NMDA rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
169
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As determined previously , neocortical recordings were performed from the region of maximal responsiveness to optic nerve (ON) stimulation of the V1 (0 -1.5 mm anterior to lambda suture and 2-3.5 mm from the midline) of P5-P6 rats using the experimental setup and conditions described previously (Leinekugel et al, 2002;Khazipov et al, 2004). Briefly, following the Guidelines of the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research of the National Research council, the pups were anesthetized by hypothermia (ice-cooling anesthesia), known to preserve the anesthetic-sensitive retinal waves (Mooney et al, 1996). Under these conditions, the heads of the pups were fixed into the stereotaxic apparatus using two metal bars fixed with dental cement on the nasal and occipital bones, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As determined previously , neocortical recordings were performed from the region of maximal responsiveness to optic nerve (ON) stimulation of the V1 (0 -1.5 mm anterior to lambda suture and 2-3.5 mm from the midline) of P5-P6 rats using the experimental setup and conditions described previously (Leinekugel et al, 2002;Khazipov et al, 2004). Briefly, following the Guidelines of the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research of the National Research council, the pups were anesthetized by hypothermia (ice-cooling anesthesia), known to preserve the anesthetic-sensitive retinal waves (Mooney et al, 1996). Under these conditions, the heads of the pups were fixed into the stereotaxic apparatus using two metal bars fixed with dental cement on the nasal and occipital bones, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, endogenous activity patterns have been replaced by an alternative, strikingly similar activity pattern-LGN neurons undergo periodic depolarizations highly correlated with neighboring cells (Mooney et al, 1996;Weliky and Katz, 1999). However, there are some important differences between the endogenous and induced patterns.…”
Section: Do Retinal Waves Play a Role In The Development Of Cortical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retinal waves are generated in the network of retinal ganglion and amacrine cells and synchronize most of retinal activity (Galli and Maffei, 1988;Meister et al, 1991;Wong et al, 1993;Torborg and Feller, 2005). Using an original in vitro preparation of the neonatal mouse intact retina and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), it was demonstrated that spontaneous retinal activity is transmitted via the optic nerve to the LGN, where it drives bursts of activity (Mooney et al, 1996). Modulation of retinal waves during the first postnatal week results in alteration of retinal projections to their subcortical targets, suggesting an instructive role for retinal waves in the development of retinogeniculate connectivity (Shatz and Stryker, 1988;Penn et al, 1998;Muir-Robinson et al, 2002;Stellwagen and Shatz, 2002;Grubb et al, 2003;McLaughlin et al, 2003;Chandrasekaran et al, 2005;Mrsic-Flogel et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%