1978
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(78)90259-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thalamic taste nuclei lesions and taste aversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Early research favored a role for the GT in CTA acquisition (e.g., Lasiter, 1985;Loullis, Wayner, & Jolicoeur, 1978;Yamamoto, 1993;Yamamoto & Fujimoto, 1991;Yamamoto et al 1995). However, more recent research, using electrolytic lesions that caused minimal damage beyond the boundaries of the GT, finds no evidence that discrete GT lesions disrupt first-order CTA (e.g., Flynn, Grill, Schulkin, & Norgren, 1991;Grigson, Lyuboslavsky, & Tanase, 2000;Reilly & Pritchard, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early research favored a role for the GT in CTA acquisition (e.g., Lasiter, 1985;Loullis, Wayner, & Jolicoeur, 1978;Yamamoto, 1993;Yamamoto & Fujimoto, 1991;Yamamoto et al 1995). However, more recent research, using electrolytic lesions that caused minimal damage beyond the boundaries of the GT, finds no evidence that discrete GT lesions disrupt first-order CTA (e.g., Flynn, Grill, Schulkin, & Norgren, 1991;Grigson, Lyuboslavsky, & Tanase, 2000;Reilly & Pritchard, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which this may also be true for the modulation of learned taste preferences (e.g., Garcia, Ervin, Yorke, & Koelling, 1967;Rozin & Kalat, 1971) remains to be determined. Loullis, Wayner, and Jolicoeur (1978) reported that some capacity to acquire a taste aversion habit appeared to be present in rats with gustatory thalamus lesions, although severe attenuation of learning was found. However, the experiment did not include controls for sensitization effects or for assessing the discriminative specificity of the taste aversion.…”
Section: Gustatory Thalamus and Amygdalamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, whereas the afferent projections from the PbN to the VPMpc were well documented, the efferent projections from the VPMpc to the PbN were not demonstrated (4,21,64). In addition, while earlier studies have shown that the VPMpc is involved in taste detection and discrimination (32), sodium appetite (30,44), and CTA (37,92,93), more recent studies have demonstrated that the VPMpc has a minimal influence on innate taste preference (15,62,78), sodium appetite (14,65), or CTA (14,65). Thorough reviews of earlier studies suggested that the claim of the involvement of VPMpc in taste preference, sodium appetite, and CTA were derived from the lesions that were misplaced, inordinately large, or destroyed fibers of passage (58,60,69).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%