Culturally Responsive Strategies for Reforming STEM Higher Education 2019
DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78743-405-920191001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

That None Shall Perish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) emerges as a national exemplar in shifting stakeholders, namely faculty and university administrators, from relying too heavily on over-prescribed "tools" to knowing and trusting themselves as undergraduate STEM reformers; and from overgeneralizing their lived experiences to building their capacity to critically question, examine, and understand the uniqueness of their institutional contexts. AAC&U's TIDES Institute (Mack et al, 2019; American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2023b) and Project Kaleidoscope STEM Leadership Institute (American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2023a) are designed to shape faculty and administrators through reflection and professional development around leadership for change. In another example, the American Physical Society and the American Association of Physics Teachers have collaborated to develop a comprehensive guide, Effective Practices for Physics Programs (EP3), to promote unit-level reflection and student-centered systemic improvement, These examples illustrate how disciplinary societies and associations can become advocates for humanized undergraduate STEM education and also provide scaffolding for change in stakeholders at other levels of the ecosystem.…”
Section: Disciplinary Societies and Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) emerges as a national exemplar in shifting stakeholders, namely faculty and university administrators, from relying too heavily on over-prescribed "tools" to knowing and trusting themselves as undergraduate STEM reformers; and from overgeneralizing their lived experiences to building their capacity to critically question, examine, and understand the uniqueness of their institutional contexts. AAC&U's TIDES Institute (Mack et al, 2019; American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2023b) and Project Kaleidoscope STEM Leadership Institute (American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2023a) are designed to shape faculty and administrators through reflection and professional development around leadership for change. In another example, the American Physical Society and the American Association of Physics Teachers have collaborated to develop a comprehensive guide, Effective Practices for Physics Programs (EP3), to promote unit-level reflection and student-centered systemic improvement, These examples illustrate how disciplinary societies and associations can become advocates for humanized undergraduate STEM education and also provide scaffolding for change in stakeholders at other levels of the ecosystem.…”
Section: Disciplinary Societies and Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the current STEM culture and the underrepresentation of Black, Latinx, and Indigenous people in STEM leads to missing critical contributors, which permeates the continued pattern of structural bias within the field. As a result, many students of color feel isolated, invisible, marginalized, and lack belongingness (Mack et al, 2019). Discrimination and reduced participation of URMs in STEM fields result in limited quantity and diversity of intellectual capital available in these fields (Ballenger et al, in press;McKim et al, 2017;Nilsson, 2017).…”
Section: Dealing With Structural Racismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRPs break down the false dichotomy of STEM problems as strictly "technical" or "social" and play a key role in connecting science with real-world and community problems [18], [19]. This enables students to develop their science and cultural identities without conflicts and improves the students' self-efficacy, belonging, and identity to STEM [17], [18], [20], [21].…”
Section: Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%