2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74119-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
199
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
199
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of our investigation, we produce further evidence for the Eichler-Shimura conjecture, as well as for a conjecture of Brumer and Kramer [5] associating abelian varieties to paramodular Siegel modular forms on Sp (4).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As a result of our investigation, we produce further evidence for the Eichler-Shimura conjecture, as well as for a conjecture of Brumer and Kramer [5] associating abelian varieties to paramodular Siegel modular forms on Sp (4).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…For that purpose, we recall the definition of Rankin-Cohen brackets as given in p. 53 of [22], which differs slightly (see below) from the original one in Theorem 7.1 of [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5], Theorem 7.1) that if f , g transform like modular forms of weight k and , respectively, then f , g n transforms like a modular form of weight k + + 2n and that f , g 0 = f · g. The interaction of the first Rankin-Cohen bracket, which itself fulfills the Jacobi identity of Lie brackets, and the regular product of modular forms give the graded algebra of modular forms the additional structure of a Poisson algebra (cf. [22], p. 53).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], the local divisor class group of a generic point of a one-dimensional boundary component has been treated, even more general in the context of the group O(2, n). Another case that has been treated by Bruinier are the cusps of Hilbert modular surfaces in [4]. Here we have to consider the zero-dimensional cusps of Siegel threefolds.…”
Section: Then the Equation σ(St ) = 1 Has A Solution T ∈ T Hence Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the sign (H) the product is not invariant under the group P. The failure of the invariance will enable us to compute the cohomology class of the divisor H(S, d) in the local divisor class group. We refer to [1] and to the article of Bruinier in [4] for similar constructions.…”
Section: We Want To Construct a Holomorphic Function With Divisor H(smentioning
confidence: 99%