Construction Research Congress 2014 2014
DOI: 10.1061/9780784413517.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 10-10 Performance Assessment Campaign: New Theories Regarding the Benchmarking of Capital Project Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To rank the preliminary list of identified variables of metrics and predictors Kang et al (2014) Determining new benchmarking theories used in the creation of the Construction Industry Institute's new benchmarking system of capital project performance…”
Section: Data and Research Methods In Cem Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To rank the preliminary list of identified variables of metrics and predictors Kang et al (2014) Determining new benchmarking theories used in the creation of the Construction Industry Institute's new benchmarking system of capital project performance…”
Section: Data and Research Methods In Cem Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that research charrettes are a hybrid method that include social data collection, most of the CEM studies that employ them and use surveys or questionnaires as an approach to collect data require having the participants answer survey questions while being colocated in one venue (Kang et al 2014;Franz et al 2017;El Asmar and Gibson 2018). However, more recent studies are utilizing Qualtrics weblink to collect responses by distributing the links using emails (Yussef et al 2017(Yussef et al , 2019Feghaly et al 2019Feghaly et al , 2020.…”
Section: Use Of Technology In Cem Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature there is a large amount of published material on metrics and measurements of construction projects (Chan and Chan 2004;Costa et al 2006;Haponava and Al-Jibouri 2011;Hughes et al 2004;Kang et al 2014;Yeung et al 2012). There is also a decent amount on VDC (Alarcón et al 2013;Fosse et al 2017;Garcia et al 2004;Khanzode 2010;Khanzode et al 2006;Kunz and Fischer 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For illustration, project cost and phase cost efficiencies are evaluated using capacities or dimension as forecasted at the conclusion of the phase and the normalized costs obtained from Tables 4 and 5. In building projects, cost efficiency is measured as the ratio of relevant costs to BGSF (Building Grass Square Footage), which means how much cost was spent per 1 BGSF (Kang et al 2014). The outcomes essentially imply the efficacy in performance for phase-level and project-level costs by the floor area of the building being designed or constructed.…”
Section: Application Of Normalized Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this issue, CII launched a phase-based benchmarking system called the 10-10 Program, which collects project data at the end of project phases so as to evaluate performance at the phase-level (CII 2013). This new benchmarking approach enables a project manager and project team of an in-progress project to identify impending problems and then to take proactive strategies for subsequent phases (Choi et al 2015;Kang et al 2014).…”
Section: Cost Normalization For Phase-based Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%