2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

Abstract: The German version of the OKS is a reliable and valid measure for the self-assessment of pain and function in German-speaking patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
80
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences between responders and non-responders related to age, gender, BMI, Sangha scores and baseline PROM values. The German versions of the following questionnaires were used: Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [12], Oxford Hip or Knee Score (OHS, OKS) [13,14], Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) [15], University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale [16] and the EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) [17, www.euroqol.org]. These instruments were chosen because they are frequently used in outcome studies related to hip and knee replacement, and/or already part of nationwide joint registries, and/or available in different languages, which allows for direct comparisons with the literature.…”
Section: Promsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were no differences between responders and non-responders related to age, gender, BMI, Sangha scores and baseline PROM values. The German versions of the following questionnaires were used: Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [12], Oxford Hip or Knee Score (OHS, OKS) [13,14], Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) [15], University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale [16] and the EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) [17, www.euroqol.org]. These instruments were chosen because they are frequently used in outcome studies related to hip and knee replacement, and/or already part of nationwide joint registries, and/or available in different languages, which allows for direct comparisons with the literature.…”
Section: Promsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instruments were chosen because they are frequently used in outcome studies related to hip and knee replacement, and/or already part of nationwide joint registries, and/or available in different languages, which allows for direct comparisons with the literature. Evidence of reliability, validity and usefulness of these measures in patients undergoing TJR has been proven in numerous studies before [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The patients were also asked to rate which of the three function-related questionnaires (WOMAC, OHS/OKS and LEFS) they consider the most relevant for assessing their joint problem and which of them the easiest to complete.…”
Section: Promsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As secondary outcomes, the valid and reliable Oxford Knee Score and the Oxford Hip Score were utilized to assess the clinical outcome in knee and hip patients, respectively [20, 21]. Patients had to answer 12 questions, each with 5 response options.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instruments used to assess the clinical results were the Knee Society score (KSS) [3], Oxford knee score (OKS) [4] and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 forms [5]. Conventional X-rays were obtained in three planes, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%