2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid calculation errors caused by using a single threshold, this study sets three time thresholds, 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min. Referring to the survey results regarding the walking speed of the elderly [56][57][58][59], the walking distance thresholds are set at 300 m, 600 m, and 900 m for the elderly population, while for the general population, they are set at 500 m, 1000 m, and 1500 m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid calculation errors caused by using a single threshold, this study sets three time thresholds, 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min. Referring to the survey results regarding the walking speed of the elderly [56][57][58][59], the walking distance thresholds are set at 300 m, 600 m, and 900 m for the elderly population, while for the general population, they are set at 500 m, 1000 m, and 1500 m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to statistical data from Nanjing, the approximate walking speed of elderly individuals was 3.5 km per hour [58]. Willberg found the walking speed of elderly individuals was 4.26 km/h through on-site measurements and data statistics [59]. These studies provide more accurate accessibility thresholds to better describe the limited mobility of the elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The guiding focus within the first group has boiled down to the question for whom short travel distances are available. Perspectives to this question have included explorations of socio-economic and spatial disparities in walking and cycling access (Calafiore et al, 2022;Elldér et al, 2018;Rosas-Satizábal et al, 2020;Smith et al, 2020;Willberg et al, 2023) and their effects on gentrification and housing prices (Yang et al, 2018), and travel frequencies (Lucas et al, 2018). From another angle, accessibility studies have examined patterns of car dependency by identifying areas in which car is the only viable transport option (Carroll et al, 2021;J.…”
Section: Efforts For Socially and Environmentally Integrative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is something of a consensus in these debates – and this is where the question of value is most visible – around the potential of ‘compact cities’ to enable environmentally, socially, and economically ‘sustainable’ and ‘innovative’ cities (Kjærås, 2021). These accounts are often accompanied by an ‘anti-sprawl’ position, more recently focussing on the ‘15-minute city’ or the ‘walkable city’, which has become more prominent following the COVID-19 pandemic (Calafiore et al, 2022; Pozoukidou and Chatziyiannaki, 2021; Wainwright, 2023; Willberg et al, 2023).…”
Section: Conceptualising Density: From Measurement To Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%