2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-008-0120-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 17 February 2006 Guinsaugon rock slide-debris avalanche, Southern Leyte, Philippines: deposit characteristics and failure mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last is the discontinuity set trending east with 31/185 • . We can verify these measured dip and dip direction to the actual field measurements considered in a post-disaster report by Catane et al (2008) as shown in Table 2. …”
Section: Identification Of Discontinuities Using Coltop3dsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Last is the discontinuity set trending east with 31/185 • . We can verify these measured dip and dip direction to the actual field measurements considered in a post-disaster report by Catane et al (2008) as shown in Table 2. …”
Section: Identification Of Discontinuities Using Coltop3dsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Based on the observed orientation of discontinuities and immense pore pressure developed from accumulated rainfall, a combined wedge, toppling, and planar slide is believed to have caused gravitational failure at Guinsaugon (Catane et al, 2008). At the foot slope of Mt.…”
Section: Failure Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the failure model of slope is controlled by rock mass structure (Bieniawski, 1989; Glastonbury & Fell, 2010; Goodman & Kieffer, 2000; Margielewski, 2006). Thus, discontinuities in the source area were usually measured to predict rock behavior on slopes (Catane et al, 2008; Pedrazzini et al, 2012). Although our experimental results clearly show that rock mass structure may influence the runout distance of analog blocks, it is difficult to apply this result to real rockfall analysis because a rock mass with joints will roll and separate in the falling stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hsu (1978) quoting Heim (1882) reports an estimated average velocity of around 50 m/s for the 1881 Elm event, while Plafker and Ericksen (1978) estimate an average velocity of 80 m/s for the 1970 Huascaran event with some detached rocks travelling at speeds in excess of 280 m/s. Large clouds of dust have been observed to be generated above such moving masses (for example, during the Frank rock avalanche of 1906 (Cruden and Hungr 1986)) and this may occur even when water ingress due to heavy precipitation and basal erosion has occurred (e.g., Catane et al 2008 on the 2006 rock-debris avalanche in Southern Leyte). On some occasions, wind blasts have occurred ahead of and adjacent to the flow (Hsu 1978;Plafker and Ericksen 1978).…”
Section: Common Elements Of Sturzströmementioning
confidence: 99%