2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘2°C capital stock’ for electricity generation: Committed cumulative carbon emissions from the electricity generation sector and the transition to a green economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An emergent feature of the CMIP5 fullcomplexity ESMs appears to be that this increase in airborne fraction approximately cancels the logarithmic relationship between CO 2 concentrations and radiative forcing, yielding an approximately linear relationship between cumulative CO 2 emissions and CO 2 -induced warming (Matthews et al, 2009;Gillett et al, 2013). This relationship has given rise to the concept of an all-time cumulative "carbon budget" to restrict warming to a certain level , which has quickly become an important tool in evaluating the required energy-system transitions that are needed to limit warming to below particular thresholds (Gignac and Matthews, 2015;Van Vuuren et al, 2016), as well as the climate implications of the existing capital stock (Davis and Socolow, 2014;Pfeiffer et al, 2016). As simple climatecarbon-cycle models are often used to compute particular carbon budgets in integrated assessment scenarios (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emergent feature of the CMIP5 fullcomplexity ESMs appears to be that this increase in airborne fraction approximately cancels the logarithmic relationship between CO 2 concentrations and radiative forcing, yielding an approximately linear relationship between cumulative CO 2 emissions and CO 2 -induced warming (Matthews et al, 2009;Gillett et al, 2013). This relationship has given rise to the concept of an all-time cumulative "carbon budget" to restrict warming to a certain level , which has quickly become an important tool in evaluating the required energy-system transitions that are needed to limit warming to below particular thresholds (Gignac and Matthews, 2015;Van Vuuren et al, 2016), as well as the climate implications of the existing capital stock (Davis and Socolow, 2014;Pfeiffer et al, 2016). As simple climatecarbon-cycle models are often used to compute particular carbon budgets in integrated assessment scenarios (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Bertram et al (2015) and Pfeiffer et al (2016) propose to rule out investment in standard coal and gas power plants, and to mandate new power plants to be renewable power, nuclear, or fossil fuel plants equipped with carbon capture and storage.…”
Section: Decentralization With Feebate or Standards On New Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have also suggested spreading awareness a out the isk of st a ded assets a d change the culture of agents in the financial industry so that they consider it part of their due diligence to beware of pote ntial stranded assets (Inquiry, 2015;Kruitwagen et al, 2016). A radical policy option is to simply forbid the construction of assets that are deemed likely to be stranded by emission reduction policies, for instance enacting moratoriums on new fossil fuel power plants, or new fossil fuel fields (Bertram et al, 2015b;Pfeiffer et al, 2016;Rozenberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Minimizing Disruptions and Increasing Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%