Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014) 2015
DOI: 10.7566/jpscp.6.010001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2012 Atomic Mass Evaluation and Future

Abstract: The Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) contains the most reliable and comprehensive information for the values of the atomic masses and their uncertainties. A wealth of new, high-precision experimental data were included in the new version, AME2012, published in December 2012, and masses of many nuclides were improved significantly. The AME2012 is described and compared with the previous AME2003 evaluation. Perspectives about the future are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the relative frame the oscillator EFT interaction is defined in the Nmax = 10 model space, and the Hamiltonian matrix elements outside this space are comprised of the kinetic energy only. Experimental data taken from [68,69]. The experimental point-proton radii are extracted from charge radii by correcting for the finite sizes of the proton and neutron, and the Darwin-Foldy term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relative frame the oscillator EFT interaction is defined in the Nmax = 10 model space, and the Hamiltonian matrix elements outside this space are comprised of the kinetic energy only. Experimental data taken from [68,69]. The experimental point-proton radii are extracted from charge radii by correcting for the finite sizes of the proton and neutron, and the Darwin-Foldy term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the interaction potential V is taken as the sum of Coulomb potential and nuclear proximity potential. The Q values are calculated using the recent mass tables of Wang et al, [10] and for which the experimental values are not available; we have taken the values from the mass tables of Koura et al, [11]. For a fixed light charged particle, the driving potential can be calculated for all possible fragment combinations as a function of mass and charge asymmetries given as Sb (N=82, Z=51), which may be the most suitable fragment combination in this ternary fission process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%