2012
DOI: 10.1080/22201009.2012.10872287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2012 SEMDSA Guideline for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes (Revised)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 • Nephropathy was deemed present if proteinuria > 300 mg per day (2+) was present on an ordinary urine dipstick in the absence of an overt urinary disease. 13 If the dipstick showed a negative response, a confirmatory test was done on the same sample with a Micral-Test® urine dipstick (Roch Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).…”
Section: Physical Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 • Nephropathy was deemed present if proteinuria > 300 mg per day (2+) was present on an ordinary urine dipstick in the absence of an overt urinary disease. 13 If the dipstick showed a negative response, a confirmatory test was done on the same sample with a Micral-Test® urine dipstick (Roch Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).…”
Section: Physical Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were summariaed with descriptive statistics. Glucose categories were classified using cut points recommended by the SEDMSA diabetes guideline 9 for diabetes testing and not the cut points used for screening. This was done in order to make comparisons with other studies possible.…”
Section: Data Management and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEMDSA prefers screenings to take place in the health care setting as community-based screening may not ensure adequate follow-up of patients with positive screening tests. 9 The test of choice for screening varies as mentioned, as do the cutoffs to be used. SEMDSA and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 10 suggest that a random plasma glucose value of ≥ 5.6 mmol/l requires further evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%