2019
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-18-0032.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2016 CEOS Infrared Radiometer Comparison: Part II: Laboratory Comparison of Radiation Thermometers

Abstract: 26To ensure confidence, measurements carried out by imaging radiometers mounted on satellites 27 require robust validation using 'fiducial quality' measurements of the same 'in-situ' parameter. 28 For surface temperature measurements this is optimally carried out by radiometers measuring 29 radiation emitted in the infrared region of the spectrum, co-located to that of a satellite 30 overpass. For ocean surface temperatures the radiometers are usually on-board ships to sample 31 large areas but for Land and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ISAR L2R files contain a variable named "quality_level" (QL) which is derived from the total expanded uncertainty estimate (variable "TEMP_2_SD" in the IMOS ISAR_QC files) as follows: QL = 0 to 2 corresponds to uncertainty > 0.2 K, QL = 4 corresponds to 0.1 K < uncertainty ≤ 0.2 K, and QL = 5 (best) corresponds to uncertainty ≤ 0.1 K [16]. The RV Investigator CSIRO ISAR temperature readings were compared with a National Physical Laboratory reference blackbody in laboratory tests during June 2016 and exhibited relatively low biases (< 0.15 K) over normal operating temperatures [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ISAR L2R files contain a variable named "quality_level" (QL) which is derived from the total expanded uncertainty estimate (variable "TEMP_2_SD" in the IMOS ISAR_QC files) as follows: QL = 0 to 2 corresponds to uncertainty > 0.2 K, QL = 4 corresponds to 0.1 K < uncertainty ≤ 0.2 K, and QL = 5 (best) corresponds to uncertainty ≤ 0.1 K [16]. The RV Investigator CSIRO ISAR temperature readings were compared with a National Physical Laboratory reference blackbody in laboratory tests during June 2016 and exhibited relatively low biases (< 0.15 K) over normal operating temperatures [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the effort to characterize uncertainties for in situ SST records is considerable not all of them are SI-traceable, in a metrological sense, which is needed for a CDR. Therefore, more recent efforts using ship-based infrared radiometers for satellite-derived SST validation have shown the value of SItraceable measurements, together with rigorous uncertainty budgets (Barton et al, 2004;Rice et al, 2004;Donlon et al, 2008;Minnett, 2010;Wimmer and Robinson, 2016) of 0.14 • C (Theocharous et al, 2016), or better. However, the measurements are sparse compared to those of drifting buoys.…”
Section: The Evolving In Situ Sst Observing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, both radiometers were calibrated against the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) ammonia heat-pipe reference blackbody during the Fiducial Reference Measurements for validation of surface temperature from satellites (FRM4STS) experiment in June 2016. It was obtained a root mean square error (RMSE) between 0.06 and 0.10 K for bands 1 to 3 and a RMSE between 0.13 and 0.23 K for bands 4 to 6 [33,37]. measurements of the sample for each band for the first period and 180 measurements for each band for the second period were used in this study.…”
Section: Cimel Electroniquece312-2mentioning
confidence: 99%