1995
DOI: 10.1016/0277-3791(95)00033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 210Pb chronology of late holocene deposition in an Eastern Australian Lake basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the site has been identified as a location of exceptional soil erosion since European settlement (Gale et al, 1995;Gale and Haworth, 2005), although this has recently been chal-lenged (Woodward et al, 2011). The site has more recently become a focus for work due to inferred changes to basin hydrology in response to tree clearance during European settlement of the New England Tablelands (Woodward et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the site has been identified as a location of exceptional soil erosion since European settlement (Gale et al, 1995;Gale and Haworth, 2005), although this has recently been chal-lenged (Woodward et al, 2011). The site has more recently become a focus for work due to inferred changes to basin hydrology in response to tree clearance during European settlement of the New England Tablelands (Woodward et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of ratio 210 Po and 209 Po activity will provide an adequate figure of supported 210 Pb, as these two elements are assumed to be in equilibrium [15] . Subtracting of supported 210 Pb from total 210 Pb will determine unsupported 210 Pb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method of validation is the use of 137 Cs, although in many cases, this proves to be inadequate due to downward diffusion or remobilisation of 137 Cs by post-depositional activity within pore waters (Appleby 2001;Laissaoui et al 2008;Putyrskaya and Klemt 2007). Alternative methods for validation include pollen, diatom, sediment geochemistry, historical records of catchment development and major climatic events (Appleby 2001;Kilby and Batley 1993;Gale et al 1995;Haworth et al 1999).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Isotope Datingmentioning
confidence: 98%