2019
DOI: 10.3171/2017.11.jns17546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 25th anniversary of the retrograde suction decompression technique (Dallas technique) for the surgical management of paraclinoid aneurysms: historical background, systematic review, and pooled analysis of the literature

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms frequently require temporary occlusion to facilitate safe clipping. Brisk retrograde flow through the ophthalmic artery and cavernous ICA branches make simple trapping inadequate to soften the aneurysm. The retrograde suction decompression (RSD), or Dallas RSD, technique was described in 1990 in an attempt to overcome some of those treatment limitations. A frequent criticism of the RSD technique is an allegedly high risk of cervical ICA dissection. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different techniques are today available for this purpose. They comprehend cervical or petrous ICA exposure, extradural or intradural clinoid ICA exposure, endovascular control with balloon-assisted occlusion or suction decompression (Dallas technique), adenosine-induced cardiac standstill, and intracavernous control [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques are today available for this purpose. They comprehend cervical or petrous ICA exposure, extradural or intradural clinoid ICA exposure, endovascular control with balloon-assisted occlusion or suction decompression (Dallas technique), adenosine-induced cardiac standstill, and intracavernous control [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of large and giant ICA aneurysms, the neck of the aneurysm is often located in the juxtadural portion of the distal dural ring. Therefore, intracranial proximal control is often impossible without direct cavernous sinus exploration, which has a significant risk for complications [ 10 ]. For this reason, temporary clipping for proximal control is usually performed on cervical ICA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Flamm 9) published the first technihttps://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0066 cal note on direct aneurysm puncture for suction decompression in 1981, this technique, termed RSD, was modified by Batjer and Samson 3) . Since the introduction of the RSD technique, more than 500 aneurysms have been treated using this approach, and morbidity and mortality rates of 19.9% and 1.3%, respectively, have been achieved 10) . Furthermore, the RSD technique enables the adequate relaxation of the aneurysm dome by applying temporary clipping on the extracranial and intracranial carotid arteries and aspirating blood by direct ICA puncture, which may raise concerns about procedure-related complications such as thromboembolic ischemia, ICA dissection or occlusion, and anemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El bypass microquirúrgico sigue siendo una modalidad de tratamiento viable, cuando el clipaje aneurismático falla, por ejemplo; cuando la tensión de la pared del aneurisma no se puede reducir con adenosina y descompresión por succión 8,11,12 . Sí el paciente tolera una oclusión temporal con balón y el aneurisma no se considera factible para el tratamiento endovascular; el segmento de la arteria carótida interna que involucra el aneurisma puede quedar atrapado o sacrificado microquirúrgicamente sin necesidad de aumentar el flujo.…”
Section: Tratamiento Microquirúrgico Abiertounclassified