AIP Conference Proceedings 1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.54149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 35 day cycle of Her X-1 and the coronal wind model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precessing motion of the disk can be understood in the context of tidal interaction and/or as a consequence of non vanishing torques acting on the disk, e.g. due to a coronal wind (Schandl & Meyer 1994;Schandl et al 1997;Shakura et al 1998;Ketsaris et al 2001). Because of the high inclination of the system, the disk periodically blocks the line of sight to the neutron star during about 60% of the 35 day cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precessing motion of the disk can be understood in the context of tidal interaction and/or as a consequence of non vanishing torques acting on the disk, e.g. due to a coronal wind (Schandl & Meyer 1994;Schandl et al 1997;Shakura et al 1998;Ketsaris et al 2001). Because of the high inclination of the system, the disk periodically blocks the line of sight to the neutron star during about 60% of the 35 day cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Abstract.We have studied the long-term behaviour of the 1.24 sec pulse period and the 35 day precession period of Her X-1 and show that both periods vary in a highly correlated way (see also Staubert et al 1997 and2000). When the spin-up rate decreases, the 35 day turn-on period shortens.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%