2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2014.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3D quantitative lattice and shape preferred orientation of a mylonitised metagranite from Monte Rosa (Western Alps): Combining neutron diffraction texture analysis and synchrotron X-ray microtomography

Abstract: This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. a b s t r a c tTwo complementary 3D techniques, neutron diffraction and synchrotron X-ray microtomography (SXRm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase-contrast X-ray µ-CT measurements based on synchrotron and microfocus X-ray sources applied in the Earth science domain represent a powerful tool for the nondestructive characterization of the internal microstructures and the mineral phases separation thanks to their different density and/or chemical composition (Polacci et al, 2010;Zandomeneghi et al, 2010;Baker et al, 2012;Cnudde and Boone, 2013). Through virtual slicing of the sample volume and applying image processing and analysis 3D tools, it is possible to achieve a quantitative shape preferred orientation (SPO) analysis by means of the extraction of geometrical, morphological, and orientation parameters (Voltolini et al, 2011;Zucali et al, 2014b).…”
Section: X-ray Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase-contrast X-ray µ-CT measurements based on synchrotron and microfocus X-ray sources applied in the Earth science domain represent a powerful tool for the nondestructive characterization of the internal microstructures and the mineral phases separation thanks to their different density and/or chemical composition (Polacci et al, 2010;Zandomeneghi et al, 2010;Baker et al, 2012;Cnudde and Boone, 2013). Through virtual slicing of the sample volume and applying image processing and analysis 3D tools, it is possible to achieve a quantitative shape preferred orientation (SPO) analysis by means of the extraction of geometrical, morphological, and orientation parameters (Voltolini et al, 2011;Zucali et al, 2014b).…”
Section: X-ray Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were cut in cubes of ≈ 1cm edge ( In order to evaluate the Crystallographic Preferred Orientation (CPO) of the samples we used the non-disruptive method of the Quantitative Texture Analysis (QTA) by neutron diffraction, successfully applied on various types of rocks and synthetic materials: in monomineralic quartzites [20], marbles [17], limestones [21], dunite [22] or glaucophanite [23], in poly-phasic rocks, as amphibolite [24,25], quartz-feldspatic mylonitic orthogneisses and gabbros [26,27], subacqueous lavas [28] or sandstones [29].…”
Section: Sample Reference System and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ), as well as in fragments of mylonitised metagranites (Zucali et al. , ) up to ca . 0.25 cm 3 in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, routine 3-D FIB-EBSD is difficult to apply on low-conductive Earth materials, and the maximum observable volume is currently up to about 10 6 µm 3 (Burnett et al, 2016 and references therein), which is at least six orders of magnitude smaller than that required for the characterisation of the microstructure of natural rocks composed of cm-sized to mm-sized crystals. To acquire mineral CPO with information on the 3-D SPO in larger samples, high-energy synchrotron X-rays and neutron diffraction were applied in shale and schist (Wenk et al, 2010), as well as in fragments of mylonitised metagranites (Zucali et al, 2014) up to ca. 0.25 cm 3 in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%