2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3D structure of the tectorial membrane determined by second-harmonic imaging microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our model, the reason for this altered longitudinal pattern of OHC loss in Tecta C1509G/+ mice, whereby OHCs at the base are relatively spared compared to those located more apically, reflects the impact of biomechanical changes within the mutant TM. These changes are predicted to alter the pattern of OHC stereociliary stimulation along the cochlear partition (Gavara and Chadwick 2009;Gu et al 2008;Gueta et al 2006Gueta et al , 2007Gueta et al , 2008Masaki et al 2010;Meaud et al 2010;Shoelson et al 2004). As well, this may represent a shift in the tonotopic map of the cochlea secondary to altered TM and OHC stiffness gradients (Choi and Oghalai 2008;Deo and Grosh 2004;Ghaffari et al 2007;He et al 2003;Liu and Neely 2009;Masaki et al 2009;Richter et al 2007;Sfondouris et al 2008;Stasiunas et al 2009) or reduced gain of the cochlear amplifier (Oghalai 2004a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our model, the reason for this altered longitudinal pattern of OHC loss in Tecta C1509G/+ mice, whereby OHCs at the base are relatively spared compared to those located more apically, reflects the impact of biomechanical changes within the mutant TM. These changes are predicted to alter the pattern of OHC stereociliary stimulation along the cochlear partition (Gavara and Chadwick 2009;Gu et al 2008;Gueta et al 2006Gueta et al , 2007Gueta et al , 2008Masaki et al 2010;Meaud et al 2010;Shoelson et al 2004). As well, this may represent a shift in the tonotopic map of the cochlea secondary to altered TM and OHC stiffness gradients (Choi and Oghalai 2008;Deo and Grosh 2004;Ghaffari et al 2007;He et al 2003;Liu and Neely 2009;Masaki et al 2009;Richter et al 2007;Sfondouris et al 2008;Stasiunas et al 2009) or reduced gain of the cochlear amplifier (Oghalai 2004a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the stiffest part of the TM and, in the basal turn of the cochlea, is the only region of the TM that becomes increasingly stiffer with increasing frequency place on the BM (8,40). Gueta et al (40) presumed that the place-dependent stiffness gradient of this zone was to facilitate energy transfer with the OHC hair bundles, whose stiffness also increases with increasing distance from the apex of the cochlea (41,42). It would appear, according to the findings reported here, that any loss of SSM, especially in the hairbundle attachment zone of the TM, is associated with a loss of the frequency-dependent stiffness of the material properties of the TM.…”
Section: In Vitro Traveling Wave Propagation Is Disrupted In All Thrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collagen filaments at the base of the cochlea are thinner and positioned parallel to one another and to the plane of the TM surface. Fibers at the apex are thicker and have been suggested to tilt at an angle with respect to the TM surface (Gueta et al, 2007). The overall structure of the TM varies along the cochlear axis, with the TM at the base being narrow and thin and at the apex, wider and thicker (Gueta et al, 2007).…”
Section: Tectorial Membranementioning
confidence: 99%