2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3DNet-Catch hydrologic model: Development and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A "virtual decision room" approach may provide an ideal environment for non-technical stakeholders to explore simulation results and to highlight integrated system-wide impacts (Schouten et al, 2016). Meanwhile, incorporation into GIS-based frameworks such as 3DNet (Todorović et al, 2019) or Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al, 2017) would enable more seamless incorporation of pre-processing and provide a suite of streamlined tools to help users create, edit, and run WSIMOD models.…”
Section: Future Work and Research Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "virtual decision room" approach may provide an ideal environment for non-technical stakeholders to explore simulation results and to highlight integrated system-wide impacts (Schouten et al, 2016). Meanwhile, incorporation into GIS-based frameworks such as 3DNet (Todorović et al, 2019) or Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al, 2017) would enable more seamless incorporation of pre-processing and provide a suite of streamlined tools to help users create, edit, and run WSIMOD models.…”
Section: Future Work and Research Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, incorporation into GIS-based frameworks such as 3DNet (Todorović et al 2019) or Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al 2017) would enable more seamless incorporation of pre-processing and provide a suite of streamlined tools to help users create, edit, and run WSIMOD models.…”
Section: Future Work and Research Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 63.5% are residential buildings (primarily single family, low-density and farm houses), 27.8% are agricultural buildings, 6.4% are commercial, educational, and government structures, with the remaining 2.3% being light industrial buildings. The characteristics of the above types of structures (i.e., occupancy classes) are typical for this region and this part of the country [32].…”
Section: Building Stock and Its Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%