“…However, iDPC-STEM is considerably more suitable for dynamical phenomena studies than electron ptychography, due to its direct imaging and vast speed advantage, because the several solid-state electron detectors that iDPC-STEM employs are two to three orders of magnitude faster than electron detecting cameras used for electron ptychography and 4D STEM, although the speed of such camera detectors are expected to improve in the near future 42,43 . For instance, four image frames of 512 x 512 pixels are acquired in about 1 minute with iDPC-STEM in this work (and up to 100 times higher frame rates are readily possible), but take at least 35 minutes with 4D STEM, which additionally produce large datasets (68 GB versus 17 MB for iDPC-STEM) and require time consuming and complex reconstructions schemes for electron ptychography 24,25,44 . We note, however, that even the fastest iDPC-STEM acquisition of a reasonable field-of-view is limited to a frame time of 0.1-1.0 second, by no means fast enough for many physical phenomena occurring on shorter timescales.…”